I acknowledge that there’s an accepted and widely practised sterilisation process underway here, carried out within the strict requirements of an international standard – ISO 10993-7 – however, the unaddressed and unresolved issue here is clear and it’s a very specific safety concern.
Please examine below a link to the dedicated evaluation process carried out by the UK Government for these imported lateral flow devices. This appears to be rushed, cursorily done, functional, and nowhere does the key area of public safety appear to have been included.
Moreover, nowhere has it been acknowledged that – post-sterilisation – the cancer-causing ethylene oxide agent remains in trace amounts in the swabs that will be invasively inserted into volunteers’ noses and throats twice a week, on into the future.
No reassurance has been provided that the constant, frequent and repeated use of these swabs by millions of people across England will not cause a cumulative, potentially dangerous build up of this toxic chemical compound over longer periods of time. This issue has simply not been addressed. Please could you contact Gavin Williamson again and make the minister aware of this serious oversight, which appears to be one of many.
We acknowledge that there’s an accepted and widely practised sterilisation process underway here, carried out within the strict requirements of an international standard – ISO 10993-7 – however the unaddressed and unresolved issue here is clear. It’s a very specific safety concern.
Please examine below the dedicated evaluation process carried out by the UK Government for imported lateral flow devices. This appears to be rushed, cursorily done, functional, and nowhere does the key area of public safety appear to have been explored or analysed.
Moreover, nowhere has it been acknowledged that – post-sterilisation – the cancer-causing ethylene oxide agent remains in trace amounts in the swabs that will be invasively inserted into volunteers’ noses and throats twice a week, on into the future.
No reassurance has been provided that frequent and repeated use of these swabs will not cause a cumulative, potentially dangerous build up of this toxic chemical compound over longer periods of time.
To compound the issue still further, even as this testing process moves on from schools and goes fully mainstream across England, the public have never been informed of any potential risk and are still in the dark.
If the government are expecting our informed consent on this, it surely is time for Prime Minister Boris Johnson to emerge from the shadows, stop being secretive, come to the dispatch box, reassure the British public and openly inform them of any potential dangers.
Bill Gates’ millions are linked to funding of the European Court of Human Rights, which has just compelled Czech children to be mandatorily vaccinated. Judges with serious financial conflicts of interest are not required to a. declare them, b. recuse themselves:
On 5th March 2021, the anniversary of the very first COVID19 death in the United Kingdom came and went. Let’s use this staging post to set out our stall here at Wirral In It Together, to explain what our blog has been covering over the last frantic, chaotic year, and to state where we now stand on the ebb and flow of such epic, cascading, global events.
What have we been up to?
Personally, research, research and even more research. In the century just passed, it was difficult and time-consuming even to plan, much less attempt such work. But now, with internet access, it’s become a ready avenue that’s accessible to capable, thinking, questioning citizens based in any privileged, western country and who find themselves needing answers. There’s no denying that a plethora of answers can now be sought and found via their desktop computers, laptops, tablets and phones.
So why not take up the opportunity? It would be foolish not to.
We should be supportive of free speech, always open-minded and naturally sceptical. Most queriers would sooner do all the digging for themselves than rely upon others, in particular those vested media interests, busy knocking each other out of the way to further their own controllers’ and employers’ unstated agendas. You know the sort. The lauded and celebrated influencers of the popular outlets. The smiling faces shouting at us from our screens / radios / newspapers. Those large egos, who push themselves as independent thinkers, but when you lift the veil, always happen to be deep in the service of the powerful; elected governments, wealthy oligarchs, billionaire proprietors and corporate lobbying groups. Those who happen to be guided by very singular, and starkly different motivations to the common man.
It became clear very early on as we delved into a wide range of mainstream, social media, internet and alternative, independent news websites, that our own UK government and media were not being honest with us – duplicitous even – as ministers repeatedly contradicted each other. As the global pandemic broke in March 2020, high up, governmental scientific advisers overegged the pudding, revealing from the outset that they could not be trusted. Meanwhile, the press / media had a cynical, watchful eye on sales / viewing figures and seemed far too keen to flaunt their own products on the back of a genuinely lethal crisis; a crisis now adopted as a sales opportunity – to prop up a historically cynical, caught out on phone hacking, and now tanking industry.
Noticeably, here in the UK, disparate media interests had come together as one to push the establishment line. It seems there may well have been at least one unannounced, non-minuted meeting called, in some shadowy backroom, to draw up a blacklist on certain subjects. And pretty soon came the marching in lockstep, the blanket omission of awkward areas and a wholesale failure to discuss the crucial pros and cons of the descending horror. This one-way traffic approach – that is rigidly adhered to – has survived intact to this day. They’ve become stuck like shit to this particular blanket, which had been furtively, yet frantically drawn across. In fact, there’s been absolutely no mature debate between their pages or across their airwaves. None whatsoever. You must have noticed?
And in keeping with this grotesque, mainstream media intimacy, this cobbled together faux-solidarity, the virus (SARS-COV-2) and disease (Covid19) have become highly-politicised footballs, to be kicked about and headed every which way. So, on the “dissemination of information” front, we as information-hungry citizens find ourselves becoming seriously short-changed, isolated, starved even, by our two main info providers, Government and media. It’s alarming.
Were you alarmed also to learn that both the British Broadcasting Corporation and the World Health Organisation were in receipt of outlandish levels of funding from United States billionaire Bill Gates? We were. So we asked ourselves: “Why would a US citizen be confidently ploughing many, MANY millions of his own precious money into these two foreign outfits? And what genuine philanthropist would apparently squander so much of his money hand over fist?
Soon, an answer materialised. As time moved on, we gazed upon the newly skewed, bizarre behaviour and output of both organisations, and the penny dropped. Gates had done it in an attempt to bribe and manipulate the grateful recipients of his cash, to twist their arms, their conduct and their content in the hope of influencing governmental health policy. He was seeking to alter the UK national broadcaster’s highly influential platform to suit his own agenda – an agenda which primarily featured the promotion of Covid19 vaccines – so that the fruits of his labour would ultimately shine and grow fat on the tree. As you probably know, it’s on the record that Gates personally stands to make a rather cool $20 billion if he’s ultimately successful in vaccinating the entire global population.
To say “there are strings attached to Bill and Melinda Gates’ donations” now ranks as one of the most colossal understatements of all time.
When you learn also that national governments and their public health services the world over are at the beck and call of the Bill Gates-captured WHO, and find themselves railroaded, with their health policies heavily influenced by the man, it makes a bizarre kind of sense. Because national health policies are now drip-fed, dictated centrally and from on high and not – as you’d expect – processed through an even-handed, correctly scrutinised democratic framework. So we stand here, horrified to report that yes, the WHO’s largest private funder by far – Bill Gates – currently appears to be succeeding hands down.
The excellent Dr Joseph Mercola has been kindly updating us on the Gates funding situation, and here’s an image from one of the doctor’s articles:
The sprawling, trawling net of global fisherman, Mr Bill Gates has been cast wider than many people think. Here’s former Pfizer Vice-president and Chief Scientist Mike Yeadon on Gates’ funding of a very important UK public regulatory body:
And Gates’ malign money manipulation doesn’t stop there. When a conflict was contrived and set up between accomplished scientist Christopher Exley, the man behind 300+ peer-reviewed papers across a career of 40 years on the deleterious impact of Aluminium – including within vaccines – and his university employer, there was only going to be one winner:
COVID-19 exists and it’s a deadly disease. The older you are, the more co-morbidities you suffer from, the greater the risk to your survival. We are not “Covid deniers” – or at least not the connotative, weaponised version of it. We’re not even sure what the term means. TV, radio and newspaper news bringers will pepper and weaponise their stories using this and other pejorative phrases (“Anti-vaxxer” is another) with the aim of dividing people and stirring up anger and resentment in the hearts of the less capable, more impressionable hordes. But noticeably, there’s never any helpful definition printed, explaining what these terms mean.
The problem with hurling vague accusations whilst deliberately making careful omissions, avoiding public debate and withholding crucial information is … when someone asks a question like, “Has any qualified scientist isolated and purified the SARS-COV-2 virus in accordance with Koch’s Postulates?” – which may arise naturally after they’ve been doing some broad ranging, independent research – the questioner can end up being rounded upon and then become unfairly and inaccurately smeared as a “Covid denier”. The current answer to the above question after almost a year of this global pandemic is “No, nobody seems to have isolated and purified the SARS-COV-2 virus”.
So the natural question following on from this is: “Why not?”
Another naturally occurring query would be: “How do we successfully vaccinate billions of people against a virus wen we don’t have all the information to hand?”
And some more: “Why were death certificates being tampered with by doctors? Why was ‘Died from COVID-19‘ being added, often fraudulently, as the cause of death?” There’s no smoke without fire and very early on, even the global mainstream media were giving numerous accounts, where people had tragically died of COVID-19, yet in reality, they had not. It was a heart attack or a brain haemorrhage or an illness that had nothing to do with COVID-19.
It eventually emerged that physicians in a growing number of countries were being motivated by a perverse – likely to be influenced by Gates – financial incentive to record deaths as COVID-19, done to basically enrich themselves, whilst boosting the COVID-19 death statistics. Generally speaking, human beings – even top professionals – are weak, frightened, greedy, opportunistic to varying degrees and when they spotted an easy chance to make a few quid / dollars / euros, with little risk of being found out and prosecuted, they ploughed full steam ahead.
And to finish, the following four links explain the situation here very well indeed:
THE CREW – A group of four unhappy friends; two couples on a boating holiday, but with marital problems. Collectively they are the middle-class, spoon-fed, trusting British public. Here, they’re a naïve sitting duck, waiting to be occupied, infected and their lives taken over by a deadly virus. As the action unfolds, they can each be seen in terms of differing public attitudes towards dangerous circumstances:
KEITH TAYLOR – Essentially a ‘conventional sceptic’. His own man. Secure in himself and his own destiny, but mistrustful of others and extremely self-unaware. He’s likely to be a pillar of his local community and a Tory voter.
The controlling partner of a novelty goods factory, Keith is the dominant mover, shaker and engine of the company through sheer force of personality. Here on holiday, what he views as his workplace ‘leadership skills’ are transferred across from head of the company to ‘skipper of the boat’, a dominant role which is self-taught from a manual. He’s supremely confident until the virus appears, and his amateur skippering “business” is quickly closed down. Upon registering the threat, Keith instantly sees a rival and begins harbouring a deep mistrust. His misgivings intensify as time goes on, but soon he is usurped as leader and brought under the virus’s control through its skilful, ‘democratic’ manipulation of his wife and friends.
JUNE TAYLOR – Keith’s wife. Here under duress, but a firm fan of the virus. She has no concerns at all, seeing it not as a threat but as attractive, deeply alluring and a powerful entity which needs to be accommodated, respected and understood. June is the only member of the crew who is defensive and sympathetic towards it. Her admiration – and later lust for it – causes her to cheat on her husband when he’s away at the factory. Right from the start of the outbreak, June is a staunch believer, and as time passes, she surrenders all resistance and becomes willingly ensnared and infected, with no hope of being rescued, much less cured.
ALISTAIR “I seem to be marooned” WINGATE – A would-be believer, but can never make his mind up. He would only grant his approval of the virus for an easy life, or at least until he can escape back home. Alistair is an equal partner at the factory but with very little control compared to Keith. He is racked by extreme self-doubt and beset with low confidence. Throughout his time on the boat, Alistair is weak, hesitant and easily dominated. He is quietly resentful and suspicious of the virus. How much of that mistrust is through genuine doubt and how much through his own inadequacy never becomes clear. At one point, Alistair is relaxing on the side of the boat, staring into the water. Reaching down quickly, he expertly catches a small fish in his bare hand and releases it, hinting there may be hidden depths, and much more to Alistair than meets the eye.
EMMA WINGATE – Alistair’s wife. Like her husband, she is undemanding, accepting and always prepared to make allowances for other people. Although happy to live in the shadow of Keith and June, she is more self-possessed, composed and tranquil of mind than her husband. Emma is first seen clutching a first aid box and spends the whole time on the boat wearing a lifejacket, a sure sign of her concern over the wisdom of being on this holiday at all. She knows the virus is very real, is quietly petrified of it and takes her own precautions against it. But even Emma’s guard goes down eventually and it becomes clear that given enough time, she seems destined to become infected, controlled and completely dominated, just like June.
VINCE GRANT – The virus and killer disease. A dishonest and disruptive outsider. Charismatic, clever, imperious and manipulative. Very early on, the virus ‘comes to the rescue’ of the marooned boat and its crew. Its vigilant eye soon sees an opportunity to take control, flourish and spread its malign influence among new ‘friends’. Reasonable at first, it invokes mutual trust and co-operation, asking them to work with it. It reassures them that all will be well if everyone performs a different function and keeps things ship shape. If they agree and accept these terms, its broad-ranging boats / river expertise will steer them through.
FLEUR – The vaccine, which comes onto the scene a long time after the initial virus / disease. As regards salvation and a cure for the crew, it quickly becomes clear that all is lost. The vaccine is just another arm of what has now morphed into an ominous threat to public health. As a past conquest of the virus, it’s ‘joined at the hip’, staying close, following barked orders and working under the insidious control of its master. So the vaccine brings absolutely no support or optimism, and no remedy to the spreading malaise. As a treatment, it’s totally ineffective, and it couldn’t hope to repair the damage to public confidence nor ease the disruption caused to everyone’s lives.
Initially, the crew / public are required to place their trust in the virus. As time goes on however, their collective belief wavers as the situation deteriorates. As Skipper, the virus quickly ‘mutates’, becoming ever more menacing as the sinister aspects to its character emerge. Ultimately, the contagion becomes completely uncontrollable, inflicting damage and looming large over everyone. The threat it carries is all-consuming, blighting lives and exposing a group of defenceless land lubbers – cast adrift in unfamiliar surroundings – to their fate. In the end, the virus, disease and vaccine assume total dominance, and become a direct threat to the survival of Alistair, Emma and June.
Until finally, Alistair “We seem to have lost a bit of the camararderie of the river” Wingate comes to their rescue…
And finally, for us, there’s no doubt about it, Alistair was given the funniest lines by Mr Ayckbourn…!
