Read all about it here:

https://haveyoursay.wirral.gov.uk/20mph-champion

---

Maybe the next step after this is fines, points and bans, all courtesy of Mrs. Fortescue, 18 Acacia Grove ???!!!!

---

Hideous conduct. But what else would you expect from a bunch of toxic individuals who represent a constant danger to society?

---

IAIN DAVIS

AUG 5

https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/go-on-fight-fight-fight?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

Siri’s testimony to the New Hampshire House Committee on COVID Response Efficacy and a lawsuit v FDA.

SASHA LATYPOVA

AUG 5

https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/aaron-siri-testifies-that-mrna-vaccines?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Nicholas Martin 
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 at 10:48
Subject: Three UK Ltd, the NPPF and telecom mast planning permission adjudication
To: <paulmartin@wirral.gov.uk>
Cc: Jez Cook, Paul Cardin, Clive Jones MP <Clive.Jones.MP@parliament.uk>

Dear Mr Martin,

I am writing to you as chair of ACHES (Adult, Child, Health & Environmental Support).

Your letters to Mr Cook, 18 June and 2 August and as attached, concerning your investigations into ICNIRP certification have been brought to my attention.

[click to see investigation findings]

In this respect I would like to suggest, further to consultation with a retired police inspector, that the potential use of a “false instrument” under the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 might be a more appropriate legal context in which to view what has been going on, not just in the Wirral but throughout the nation.

Set out below is his reasoning:

“From the circumstances you describe we are dealing with potential offences under The Forgery and Counterfeiting Act of 1981.

S1 of that act states:

A person is guilty of forgery if he makes a false instrument, with the intention that he or another shall use it to induce somebody to accept it as genuine, and by reason of so accepting it to do or not to do some act to his own or any other person’s prejudice.”

An instrument is defined under S8(1)(a) as ‘Any document whether of a formal or informal character’

‘False’ is defined at section 9 Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981. Section 9(1)(a) – (g) sets out 8 exhaustive scenarios in which an instrument is false for the purposes of the FCA 1981.

Whether an instrument falls within any of these scenarios will be fact specific and potentially complex. An instrument that contains within it a false statement will not necessarily render the instrument itself a forgery. A lie is a false statement, but documents containing lies or false statements are not always regarded as false instruments. A false instrument is one that “purports” to be something which it is not – i.e. it must tell a lie about itself (see the decision by the House of Lords in R v More [1988] 86 Crim App R 234).

I believe S9(1)(b) fits our scenario:

‘An instrument is false if it purports to have been made in the form in which it is made on the authority of a person who did not in fact authorise its making in that form’

So the instrument is false in that it tells a lie about itself in that it purports to have been made by Three UK Limited, which is impossible because that corporation is no longer trading. Which leads us to the question ‘Why?’

S10(1)(b)(ii) states:

an act or omission intended to be induced is to a person’s prejudice if, and only if, it is one which, if it occurs—

(b)will result in somebody being given an opportunity—

(ii)to gain a financial advantage from him otherwise than by way of remuneration; or

The argument here I would suggest is that the intended act to be induced by the person accepting the certificate as genuine is for the planning application to be approved and the financial advantage would be that in the event of an incident or claim related to the mast in question, the telecom company would not be the liable party – that would fall to the council who accepted the false instrument as genuine.

Section 3 of the Act creates the offence of ‘Using a False Instrument’ :

It is an offence for a person to use an instrument which is, and which he knows or believes to be, false, with the intention of inducing somebody to accept it as genuine, and by reason of so accepting it to do or not to do some act to his own or any other person’s prejudice.

So this is our initial position in reporting the crime allegation, we have potential offences of making and using a false instrument, however, it will be prudent to mention that this is not an isolated incident, and that a number of employees at various locations in the UK are uttering these false instruments intending that they be accepted as genuine. This would suggest a pattern of behaviour that is potentially about avoiding liability in the event of any incidents or claims in relation to specific masts, which gives the telecom company a financial advantage (a potentially huge one).”

Attached (file name ICNIRP Certification) is a letter ACHES recently sent to the Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government, Angela Rayner. This department of state being most relevant to local planning authorities, of course.

To express all this in layman`s terms, imagine if a person were to be stopped for speeding and the police were to ask the driver for his driving licence and the driver then said here you are officer, use this one from my Grandad who died on 17 October 2015. Would the police accept that ? Of course not, so why would it be acceptable to the police that telecom masts all over the country have been granted planning permissions on the basis of certificates to protect public health, issued in the name of a “dead” legal entity – and we are talking about certificates to safeguard public health.

The second point that has been brought to my attention relates to earlier correspondence between Mr Cook and Wirral Council relating to para 117 of the NPPF and the apparent change from “near”  to “within” as in the below:

‘117 a.) The outcome of consultations with organisations with an interest in the proposed development, in particular with the relevant body where a mast is to be installed near a school or college…’

117 a.) The outcome of consultations with organisations with an interest in the proposed development, in particular with the relevant body where a mast is to be installed within a school or college.’

I very much look forward to hearing from you on both these points, which are of national interest and so I have copied in my own MP for Wokingham. Wokingham has also granted planning permission to a mast in Rances Lane, Wokingham, on the basis of a Three UK Ltd certificate. I have copied in Mr Cook and Mr Cardin who have been keeping ACHES up to date on the investigation you have undertaken in the Wirral, as detailed in your letters to Mr Cook of 18 June and 2 August.

As this is a very important subject and in line with the Nolan Principles of openness in public office, this email is likely to be viewed by many who are extremely interested in these subjects and in how things unfold, nationally in this regard.

With kind regards

Nicholas Martin

For and on behalf of ACHES

---

This is HUGE

Feedback from a planning consultant who worked with Wirral Council

The deaths of two special needs children at Millstead School, Liverpool, UK

Response to UK Health Security Agency from the EM Radiation Research Trust Calling for a full investigation into the phone mast near Millstead School following the deaths of the two children

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

Mirrors my own case Leonard Lawrence

Another Victim of the criminal organisation known as the Office of the Official Solicitor

I have been another victim of the criminal organisation known as the office of the official solicitor. 

The head of this organised crime network, Alistair Pitblado & staff, Joseph Goswell, Zena Soormally and Adelaide Samson-Tandoh

ALL conspired with my corrupt probate solicitor Elizabeth Fry of WARDS solicitors Bristol to knowingly commit a gross act of fraud which involved obtaining a false

medical report from a corrupt retired Bristol GP Christine Hoyte, a medical report completed behind my back with no medical, five months after the GP had last

seen me for a sore throat and with no history whatsoever of mental incapacity.

The report which all authorities refused to let me have sight of stated I lacked the mental capacity to communicate decisions or understand anything anyone was

telling me & as such the probate case following the death of my late Grandmother whose death was as a provable result of deliberate NHS malice by the colleagues

of corrupt GP Christine Hoyte, was handled behind my back & without my input by Elizabeth Fry of WARDS solicitors who acted directly for Alistair Pitblado.

In conjunction with a corrupt, non-court of protection appointed judge, DJ Michael Daniel of Bristol County Court, these criminals arranged behind my back, the sale

of my home of 43 years, bought in 1936 by my late Grandmother & fully paid for before I was born. On 18th May 2011. without any notice or warning, I was violently

evicted from my home by 8 bailiffs who came through interior walls with sledgehammers.

I had / have multiple disabilities which were known to the corrupt parties, including, an arthritic crumbling spine, asthma, angina, PTSD & Agoraphobia. I was thrown

onto the street with nothing more than the clothes on my back, supporting the bailiffs were at least a dozen Avon & Somerset police officers who I informed were

aiding and abetting a serious criminal offence but most of them were smirking.

My home with a value of! £160k, was auctioned by solicitors for £126k, the opponent, Gran’ s estranged daughter who had produced a provably fraudulent will

received £44k, her solicitors Veale Wasborough received £38k, Elizabeth Fry of Wards solicitors in the name of the Official solicitor paid themselves £37k,( I had

been paying legal aid for the 2 years of this legality to Wards solicitors) only recently after living in severe poverty for over 12 months have I received just under

£7k as settlement in this matter.

A few months prior to my unannounced violent criminal eviction I obtained a crime report number from A&S police against corrupt District Judge Michael Daniel,

not only did A&S police not investigate the report they assisted in the violent eviction as this cctv footage will show.

This was arranged by Elizabeth Fry & Alistair Pitblado, acting in my best interests as an alleged ‘protected party’

The only thing protected by this corrupt system is the bank balances of these criminals, abusing persons by wrongfully having them classed as lacking capacity

without medicals for the sole purpose of stealing & personally financially gaining from the theft of a persons entire estate. Jonathan Djanogly of the MOJ ignores

any and all communications sent to him regarding these known practices of organised crime committed by & protected by his establishment.

---

Len, do you still have a copy of the video of Gilliland’s eviction?

http://paulcardin.substack.com

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

Part 1: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 2: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-f45?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 3: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-335?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 4: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-ab5?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 5: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-5b1?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall Parts 1 – 5

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Paul Cardin 
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 at 23:35
Subject: Wirral Council 5G findings
To: <tips@dailymail.com>, The Daily Mail

<guardian.readers@theguardian.com>, The Guardian

<mirrornews@mirror.co.uk>, The Daily Mirror

<jamie.bowman@newsquest.co.uk>, Editor, Wirral Globe

Craig Manning <craig.manning@nqnw.co.uk>, Journalist, Wirral Globe

<news@liverpool.com>, The Liverpool Echo

Dear All,

As can be viewed here, Wirral Council finds itself and others not guilty of fraud or ANY wrongdoing. Many links contained.

5G Investigation: A Woeful Wirral Whitewash

As for me and my members, we feel it would be wiser to await the verdict of a judge,

Many thanks,

Paul Cardin 

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

---

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

I’ve been very busy … I’ve needed to be. Below are 101 examples of Wirral Labour / Tory / LibDem scandals, abuse of disabled people, corruption, lies, cover-ups, distortions, conflicts of interest, whitewash investigations, kickbacks, cronyism, control of the local media, gags, bumper pay-offs and clean bills of health to the guilty … and much more … all gathered over the last 10 years.

http://paulcardin.substack.com

No wonder trust in the mainstream medical community has sunk from 71.5% to 40.1%.

STEVE KIRSCH

AUG 5

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/the-virus-was-safer-than-the-vaccine?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me

Part 1: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 2: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-f45?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 3: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-335?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 4: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-ab5?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Part 5: https://open.substack.com/pub/iaindavis/p/the-bizarre-trial-of-richard-d-hall-5b1?r=1tfxq8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall Parts 1 – 5

https://off-guardian.org/2024/08/03/watch-meet-the-sentient-world-simulation-how-the-government-predicts-the-future/

---

Wirral Residents Association

---

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me