The Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent was obviously a decision reached by the ICO and Court of Appeal via a subjective mindset.

Objective v Subjective.

It is fairly apparent to me that the ICO and FTT/UT Judges are not familiar with the difference between OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE.

Ditto for Politicians. The Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent was obviously a decision reached by the ICO and Court of Appeal via a subjective mindset. It stinks of corruption and should not be allowed to be the Court Precedent for vexatious cases.

Alan M Dransfield


Unknown's avatar

About Wirral In It Together

Campaigner for open government. Wants senior public servants to be honest and courageous. It IS possible!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.