What A Wanker, No Poverty In The UK Claims Alan Fucking Sugar

the void

sir-alan-sugar He dresses like a tit as well.

If you ever wanted proof that making lots of money turns you into a wanker then just spend some time listening to Alan fucking Sugar.  Just days after a Kensington millionaire newspaper columnist declared there is no housing crisis in the UK, Sugar has gone one step further and said there’s no poor people as well.

The reason for his insight is that some people have mobile phones and microwaves and this means they can’t be really poor, like he was before these things were invented.  Which is like somone from the middle ages saying that Alan Sugar can’t have been properly poor growing up because his house was made of bricks.  It’s a fucking stupid thing to say but then what do you expect from a demented cumstain in a posh suit who sits behind a desk too big for him…

View original post 697 more words

About Wirral In It Together

Campaigner for open government. Wants senior public servants to be honest and courageous. It IS possible!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to What A Wanker, No Poverty In The UK Claims Alan Fucking Sugar

  1. Bobby 47 says:

    That it’s come to this! The author of this ‘piece’, the remarkably gifted Cardin, who’s literary works have relied upon a high intelligence quotient and an impressive command of the English vocabulary, has now sunk into the uncharted depths of our civil gutter and described Lord Sugar as a ‘Cumstain’! Sweet loving Jesus! Is there no end to these distortions of our great written language.
    Yes! To suggest Lord Sugar masturbates is, as far as I’m concerned a measured, balanced and very reasonable comment to make. Let’s face it, for the most part, whilst opinion can be divided, most men and woman, both sexes are equally capable of pleasuring themselves in the privacy of their locked bathroom, it’s not unreasonable to imply that Lord Alan masturbates. Who doesn’t? I’m all for defending any man or woman, both sexes are equally capable of the ‘sneaky touching of their private parts’ in order to achieve personal sexual gratification, who clams that Lord Sugar has been masturbating but to then go onto describing the aforementioned Lord Sugar as a ‘cumstain’ is a step to far if anything I utter is worth a jot of notice.
    I’ll tell you all now, if I were Lord Sugar and for some strange reason I found myself reading that I was described as a ‘cumstain’, I’d be very angry and upset. Who wouldn’t be? You’d be an odd sort of fish if you were happy to be referred to as a stain following an ejaculation of semen.
    I’ve been called many names in my time but never has my presence on this good Earth ever been likened to a stain brought about by a deposit of semen. And so, given my forthright objection to this very negative descriptive word that describes Lord Sugar as a ‘cumstain’, I’m telling Cardin now if the Constable ever taps on my door asking me what my views are on Lord Sugar, I’m going to say exactly what I think, which is, Lord Sugar is probably a wanker, though I’ve no certainly it’s true, who’s got little or no knowledge of poverty levels in our once great Country but he is most definitely not anything like a stain caused by a rapid deposit of manly semen accompanied by a howl of delight, ‘You’re Fired,’ after Lord Sugar has finished rubbing his penis.

  2. Bobby 47 says:

    Take care lad. Good to read you.

  3. Wirral In It Together says:

    It wasn’t me. I reblogged it mate ! “[originally posted on The Void]”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s