26th June 2014 – UPDATE – Wirral Council have capitulated, and have now withdrawn ALL their ‘vexatious’ refusals targetted against me. Not content with this however, monitoring officer Surjit Tour, head of the legal “team” has made a veiled threat on the WhatDoTheyKnow website.
12th February 2014
Wirral Council has been struggling to extricate itself from its own self-inflicted woes for quite some time now. With its reputation in tatters and plummeting headlong to ever deeper lows, the council is now desperate to clean up its blackened image – by putting it about that an LGA “Improvement” Board, reputedly “independent” and with no axe to grind, has found that the place is improving. Well, they would say that wouldn’t they?
And with the spectre of WirralGate looming LARGE, and soon to blow sky high, it’s all a bit preposterous isn’t it?
The LGA happens to be the “trade union” for local authorites, with a long history of backing its 100s of local authority members to the hilt. No matter what crookedness they’ve been involved in. As long as our money rolls in to feed its gaping maw and build its rotten edifice, it will serve and protect itself and its crooked, self-serving subscribers. So we’re left asking ourselves the question, “Do these people actually think we are stupid?”
The answer seems to be a resounding “Yes”.
Over the years, Wirral Council has been forced into a corner, not just by politically astute, actively engaged members of the public, but by:
-
fed up and embattled council tax payers
-
the local media (minus the curiously cowed, servile, got at and now obedient since Feb 2013 Wirral News)
-
dedicated thorn in the side blogs such as Wirral Leaks, John Brace and this one
-
its own incompetent, bungling, accountability dodging councillors
-
senior officers, attending committees in order to bamboozle rather than enlighten
-
the decision to invest the former leader of the abusive council with the office of Mayor – coming soon…
-
…and god alone knows how much more. I won’t trot it all out again here
The council – myopic, upset, petulant, spurned, nursing a grudge, and with absolutely zero sense of self-awareness, has been hitting out with very ill-advised and reactionary Section 14 vexatious refusals to probing Freedom of Information requests.
And I’m not the only Wirral resident being clobbered by these.
Here are three of mine that met with Monitoring Officer Surjit Tour’s team vexatious “club over the head”:
Vexatious Request 1 – Overturned. Details here
Vexatious Request 2 – Overturned. Details here
Vexatious Request 3 – (not yet) Overturned. Details here.
He was just asking to be shot down in flames, and I’ve obliged. Here’s a reminder of Wirral Council’s recent shaming experiences…
-
Two periods of monitoring by the ICO following its extremely poor FoI / Data Protection performance
-
Mentioned before a Parliamentary Committee by the Information Commissioner Christopher Graham as a place he’d like to send in a team to sort out
-
Wirral CEO being made to sign an ICO undertaking to improve performance and make a public statement backing that up
-
Pride of place at the start of Liverpool think tank Ex Urbe’s recently released “Like Pulling Teeth” FoI report on local councils




Can you tell me why do we have a mayor it cost money and with your cutbacks like kids school crossings street lights were life is more to me than a mayor and stairs I pads going to meetings manchester at a big cost i bet i will get no answer to the questions
LikeLike
I’m no constitutional expert Charles, but I think it’s done mainly from a sense of tradition, and because it’s always been done. You are right – it costs money – a lot of money, and to me only serves a few vested interests, rather than the general public at large.
Ambitious councillors like to become mayor, and we’ve seen plenty of those on Wirral. I won’t name names, but some of these have survived very well-founded complaints into their behaviour, their declared interests and the true nature of the relationships they’ve built beyond scrutiny and public oversight, with people and businesses dependent upon council services.
The position of mayor also exists in a ceremonial manner, or celebratory manner, attending 100th birthday celebrations, or providing photo opportunities to businesses (very often with publicity at the forefronts of their minds).
The people who defend the role of the mayor are very often the ones who need looking at more closely and going over with a fine toothcomb – simply because there’s something in it for THEM. I agree with you, we could save a lot of money by getting rid of the mayor, and gain additional advantages by cleaning up the council’s reputation in the process.
This year, the former leader of the abusive council becomes Mayor, which says it all.
This should NOT be allowed to happen.
LikeLike
Pingback: Unhelpful ICO response, when a Council was found to have given false information | Wirral In It Together
Pingback: Victory for Wirral In It Together. Paul Cardin defeats Wirral Council – again | Wirral In It Together
Pingback: An email we sent 9 years ago to someone called “Frater” which never received a response, despite him being called in to address Wirral Council’s disability discrimination and being paid £1,200 per day for his alleged work | Wirral In It
Pingback: An email we sent 9 years ago to someone called “Frater” which never received a response, despite him being called in to address Wirral Council’s disability discrimination and being paid £1,200 per day for his alleged work | Wirral In It
Pingback: List of Wirral Council scandals from a few years back. Nowhere near exhaustive. | Wirral In It Together
Pingback: Wirral, Sandwell, now Salford. “Highly respected” my arse. Thanks 😁 | Wirral In It Together