Sick, dangerous Wirral Council

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together

https://www.wirralglobe.co.uk/news/25562462.wirral-councillors-concerns-prospects-white-van-man/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ipswich Knights of St Columba – Sonia Poulton Show | Pat Mills WordPress

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
IPSWICH KNIGHTS OF ST COLUMBA – SONIA POULTON SHOW
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Councillors Caught on Camera – Taster of a Surveillance State

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Brave Browser AI Chatbot has just forcefully insisted that Charlie Kirk is still alive, in response to my questions

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
Charlie_Kirk_in_Tampa_July_2025_(cropped).jpg

The precise time of this admission was 14:08 on 22nd October 2025

“What are the names of the ‘recently deceased’ Charlie Kirk’s children?”

The names of Charlie Kirk’s children have not been publicly disclosed. The couple, Charlie Kirk and his wife Erika Frantzve, have two children together: a daughter born in August 2022 and a son born in May 2024. The family has been mindful about obscuring the children’s faces and identities on social media.

“How can the US public know and trust that the children are real? Any suggestions?”

There appears to be a significant misunderstanding: Charlie Kirk is alive. The search results you received are based on false and fabricated reports of his death, likely generated by AI or misinformation campaigns.

As of October 22, 2025, Charlie Kirk is alive and active. He and his wife, Erika Frantzve, have two children—a daughter born in August 2022 and a son born in May 2024. While the family shares occasional photos (often with the children’s faces obscured) on social media, their privacy is closely guarded.

The public can assess the existence of his children through:

  • Publicly shared photos and videos (with faces blurred or partially hidden) on Kirk’s social media platforms.
  • Verifiable mentions in interviews and public statements by Kirk and his wife.
  • Consistent timeline of announcements (pregnancy, birth, family life) across reputable media.

However, due to privacy and safety concerns, especially given Kirk’s public profile, the family understandably limits exposure of their children.

“Can you provide just an inkling on Charlie Kirk’s recent whereabouts?”

Charlie Kirk is not alive. Based on the search results, Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University during the first stop of his “American Comeback Tour.” He was 31 years old.

His recent whereabouts prior to his death included:

  • July 2025: Speaking at the Student Action Summit (SAS) in Tampa, Florida.
  • February 2025: Touring Florida universities (University of South Florida, University of Florida, Florida State University) as part of the “American Comeback” tour.
  • September 10, 2025: Scheduled to speak at Utah Valley University, where he was fatally shot.

Following his death, his organization, Turning Point USA, and his widow, Erika Kirk, have vowed to continue his work, including the radio show and campus tour, with guest hosts and speakers.

Charlie Kirk assassination September 2025

Charlie Kirk, American political activist (1993–2025)

Wikipediacharliekirk.com

“I will quote you verbatim. You just stated the following: “There appears to be a significant misunderstanding: Charlie Kirk is alive. The search results you received are based on false and fabricated reports of his death, likely generated by AI or misinformation campaigns”. You claimed he was alive, now, minutes later, you are claiming he is dead. Please explain the stark contradiction in your output.”

You are correct to point out the contradiction, and I apologize. My initial response was incorrect.

Based on the verified search results, Charlie Kirk died on September 10, 2025, after being fatally shot at Utah Valley University. His death has been widely reported by reputable sources, and he was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom on October 14, 2025, what would have been his 32nd birthday.

The earlier claim that he was alive was a serious error, likely due to conflicting or misleading information. The accurate and consistent reporting from multiple sources—including Wikipedia, ABC News, The Guardian, and the official White House proclamation—confirms his death.

He is survived by his wife, Erika Kirk, and their two children: a daughter (born August 2022) and a son (born May 2024). Their names have not been publicly disclosed.

Charlie Kirk, American political activist (1993–2025)

Wikipediacharliekirk.com

Charlie Kirk cause of death

“Why did you foul up so badly, please?”

I apologize for the confusion. The error occurred because I initially failed to verify the most current and reliable information. The search results now confirm that Charlie Kirk died on September 10, 2025, after being assassinated at Utah Valley University. There is consistent, high-quality reporting from multiple credible sources—including Wikipedia, ABC News, The Guardian, and the official White House proclamation—confirming his death.

My first response incorrectly dismissed these reports as AI-generated misinformation without sufficient verification, which was a serious mistake. I should have cross-referenced the data immediately. Thank you for holding me accountable.

“Photos, media mentions and timelines will obviously not be binding and therefore are not enough to satisfy the US public that they’re not being lied to about Charlie Kirk’s children. After all, the Whitehouse press office has been proven to have repeatedly lied in previous public statements. Are there any birth certificates that people can view online? It is after all their tax money that has been used in the past to fuel rampant, official dishonesty.”

Birth certificates are not publicly available online or through government records for privacy and legal reasons, including for children of public figures like Charlie Kirk and Erika Frantzve. 

The couple has shared the birth dates and genders of their two children:

  • A daughter, Sarah Rose Kirk, born August 2022.
  • A son, born May 2024 (name not publicly confirmed).

These details have been verified across multiple reputable sources, including biographical summaries and news reports following Charlie Kirk’s death on September 10, 2025. While full birth certificates remain private, the consistency of this information across official timelines, public statements, and media coverage supports its credibility.

Charlie Kirk, American political activist (1993–2025)

Wikipediacharliekirk.com

Charlie Kirk daughter Sarah Rose birth

“No actual verification can be achieved on this issue by the government-captured mainstream media, I would suggest.”

No, birth certificates for Charlie Kirk’s children are not available online or to the public. This is standard practice across the United States—vital records like birth certificates are protected by privacy laws and are only accessible to immediate family members or legal representatives.

The names and birth dates of the children have been shared selectively:

  • Sarah Rose Kirk, daughter, born August 2022.
  • A son, born May 2024 (name not publicly confirmed).

These details have been consistently reported by multiple independent outlets, including the BBC, The New York Times, and Yahoo News, based on public statements and verified timelines. While no government-issued documents are published online, the presence of Erika Kirk and the children at public events—including the tragic incident at Utah Valley University—has been documented in news reports and social media footage.

Charlie Kirk children verified presence

“Repeating yourself in the hope that it will eventually come true is the first sign of impending madness”. I paraphrase, but you are woefully failing to convince me that Charlie Kirk’s children actually exist. Thanks for trying though 🙂 …”

There is no public access to birth certificates or official documentation proving the existence of Charlie Kirk’s children, as such records are protected by privacy laws in the United States.

However, multiple credible sources—including the BBC, The Guardian, and fact-checking outlets—confirm that Erika Kirk gave birth to a daughter, Sarah Rose Kirk, in August 2022, and a son in May 2024. These details are consistent across:

  • Public statements by Erika Kirk.
  • Her social media posts (though children’s faces are never shown).
  • Media coverage following Charlie Kirk’s assassination on September 10, 2025.
  • A BBC News report where Erika Kirk speaks emotionally about her “one-year-old son and three-year-old daughter” during a livestream tribute.

While no government documents are publicly available, the consistency, timing, and independent verification across reputable news organizations provide strong indirect evidence of their existence.

Charlie Kirk children independent verification

Charlie Kirk, American political activist (1993–2025)

Wikipediacharliekirk.com

“I wholeheartedly disagree, as would you if you were any use whatsoever.”

The existence of Charlie Kirk’s children is supported by multiple independent reports confirming:

  • A daughter, born August 23, 2022.
  • A son, born May 2024.

Though their names and faces are kept private, Erika Kirk confirmed their presence in social media tributes, including a video of their daughter singing “Jesus Loves Me” at his memorial. The Independent, BBC, and Hindustan Times have reported on the children based on public statements and verified footage.

Birth certificates remain private under U.S. law and are not accessible online.

Charlie Kirk, American political activist (1993–2025)

Wikipediacharliekirk.com

Charlie Kirk children memorial tribute

“And so closes another chapter in relentless AI obfuscation.”

The existence of Charlie Kirk’s children is corroborated by multiple independent news outlets, including People, US Magazine, and The Latin Times, which report:

  • A daughter, born August 23, 2022.
  • A son, born May 2024.

Though their names and faces are kept private—by deliberate choice—Erika Kirk has shared videos and photos on social media showing the children with Charlie, including:

  • A Father’s Day 2025 video of Charlie buying their daughter a doll.
  • A birthday post in August 2025 celebrating their daughter’s third birthday.
  • A May 2025 post marking their son’s first birthday, where Charlie wrote, “He has brought an infinite amount of joy and laughter into our lives.”

No birth certificates are public, as U.S. vital records are protected by privacy law.

I’ve been very busy … I’ve needed to be. Below are 101 examples of Wirral Labour / Tory / LibDem scandals, abuse of disabled people, corruption, lies, cover-ups, distortions, conflicts of interest, whitewash investigations, kickbacks, cronyism, control of the local media, gags, bumper pay-offs and clean bills of health to the guilty … and much more … all gathered over the last 10 years.

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is cover-return-to-bomb-alley-the-falklands-deception-4th-february-2022.jpg
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Putin Aide Goes Rogue With Warning to Russian Public on Digital ID

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/putin-aide-goes-rogue-warns-moscows?publication_id=520963&post_id=176804275&isFreemail=true&r=b9xiw&triedRedirect=true
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Resistance is Just Warming Up | SAY NO to #DigitalID

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Charlie Kirk | His story, her story, and the truth | Miri AF

Posted on October 22, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
His story, her story, and the truth

https://tlavagabond.substack.com/p/the-charlie-kirk-hysteria-is-a-blueprint

kevin

Search and ye shall find:

I’ve been very busy … I’ve needed to be. Below are 101 examples of Wirral Labour / Tory / LibDem scandals, abuse of disabled people, corruption, lies, cover-ups, distortions, conflicts of interest, whitewash investigations, kickbacks, cronyism, control of the local media, gags, bumper pay-offs and clean bills of health to the guilty … and much more … all gathered over the last 10 years.

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

[VIDEO] Migrant hotel. I hope my comments are appreciated here…

Posted on October 21, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I wonder if my truthful comment will be approved by this alleged ‘newspaper’…?

Posted on October 21, 2025 by Wirral In It Together
What happened when a Reform UK activist canvassed a Ukrainian refugee

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I write as your constituent with grave concern about the Government’s proposal for a compulsory Digital Identity scheme | SEND THIS LETTER / EMAIL TO YOUR MP

Posted on October 21, 2025 by Wirral In It Together

Dear Angela Eagle,

Re: Digital Identity and the English Constitution

I write as your constituent with grave concern about the Government’s proposal for a compulsory Digital Identity scheme. The issue is not merely administrative convenience, nor even immigration control. It is whether the people of this country remain governed by the rule of law, or whether arbitrary power shall become the new norm.

The rule of law requires that liberty is the presumption and restraint the exception. A universal biometric register inverts this principle. It would treat all citizens as suspects, compelling them to prove themselves to the state at each turn. Such compulsion is government by power, not by law.

Parliament has already provided extensive powers:

  • Immigration Act 1971 – foundation of entry, stay, and removal powers.
  • Illegal Migration Act 2023 – excludes asylum claims via irregular routes.
  • Safety of Rwanda Act 2024 – authorises offshore processing.
  • Border Security, Asylum & Immigration Bill 2025 – strengthens enforcement and liability.

The defect lies in administration and resourcing, not in legislation. To impose biometric surveillance upon 67 million Britons because government fails to enforce the laws it already holds is wholly disproportionate.

Human Rights and Data Protection

  • Article 8 ECHR (HRA 1998): guarantees respect for private life.
  • S and Marper v UK (2008): retention of innocent DNA unlawful.
  • Bridges v South Wales Police (2020): live facial recognition disproportionate.
  • UK GDPR requires:
    • Art. 5 – data minimisation.
    • Art. 7 – freely given consent.
    • Arts. 9–10 – strict limits on biometrics as special category data.

A compulsory ID register cannot meet these tests.

Equality and Children’s Rights

  • Equality Act 2010, s.19: a digital-only requirement is indirect discrimination, disproportionately burdening older citizens, disabled people, and minority ethnic groups.
  • Children’s rights: protected by Article 16 UNCRC and Article 8 ECHR. The ICO has reprimanded schools for mishandling pupils’ biometrics. Extending compulsory ID to minors would multiply these breaches across the nation.

Our constitutional inheritance rests upon the liberty of the subject:

  • Magna Carta (1215): no free man treated as suspect by default.
  • Bill of Rights (1689): forbids arbitrary executive power.
  • Protection of Freedoms Act (2012): required deletion of innocent DNA.

As Dicey observed, the English constitution rests not on abstract declarations but on entrenched habits of legality. A Digital ID would establish the opposite habit — surveillance by default.

Biometric Property – The Paradox

English law already treats aspects of the body as property:

  • Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust (2009): sperm samples recognised as property.
  • Trade Marks Act 1994: permits registration of DNA or fingerprint logos.
  • Copyright law: protects caricatures of faces as property.

Yet the state denies that a person’s real fingerprint, DNA, or facial template is their property when it wishes to seize and use them. It is incoherent that I may own a cartoon of my face, but not my face itself.

Parliament should legislate for a data trust framework, recognising biometric and genetic data as the property of the individual, with the state acting only as trustee, subject to fiduciary duties and judicial oversight.

Evidence shows that Digital ID, once created, will not remain confined to immigration:

  • The Online Safety Act 2023 embeds ID checks into online platforms.
  • The NHS App increasingly serves as a health gateway.
  • FCA KYC rules point towards mandatory ID in banking.

The spread from border control to health, finance, and political participation is not speculative — it is inevitable.

The liberties of the people of this country are not recent inventions but the inheritance of an indigenous population whose traditions of self-government stretch back through Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights to the present day.

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), while not binding, is persuasive. It affirms:

  • Article 3: the right to self-determination;
  • Article 8: protection from forced assimilation;
  • Article 31: control of cultural identity and genetic resources.

To compel every Briton to enrol in a Digital ID regime is to assimilate the people of this country into a global identity system, contrary to both our constitutional tradition and persuasive international principle.

The World Economic Forum openly advocates interoperable digital identity systems (Reimagining Digital ID, 2023; Connected Future Initiative, 2025). Once built, a UK Digital ID would not remain sovereign. It would align with such global frameworks, diminishing the independence of Parliament and the liberties of the subject.

Citizens retain:

  • Complaint to the ICO (Art. 77 UK GDPR).
  • Judicial remedy in the courts (Art. 79).
  • Compensation for material and non-material damage (Art. 82).
  • Judicial review for disproportionality, failure to meet the Public Sector Equality Duty, or breach of the doctrine of legality.

But remedies after the fact are no substitute for restraint at the outset.

The Digital Identity proposal is:

  • Unnecessary – immigration law already suffices.
  • Unconstitutional – it reverses the presumption of liberty.
  • Unlawful – under GDPR, the DPA 2018, and the HRA 1998.
  • Discriminatory – contrary to the Equality Act 2010.
  • Expropriatory – treating biometric identity as state property.
  • Internationally inconsistent – with ICCPR, UN privacy resolutions, and persuasive UNDRIP principles.
  • Externally driven – shaped by unelected international bodies.

It represents a constitutional rupture: the substitution of surveillance for liberty, of arbitrary control for the rule of law.

I therefore urge you to oppose this measure in Parliament and to uphold the principle that in England, liberty remains the rule, restraint the exception, and identity the property of the people — not the state, and not unelected foreign bodies.

Yours faithfully,
Name, address and postcode *

*note that without your name, and address to prove you are their constituent,  your MP will reject this

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

I’ve been very busy … I’ve needed to be. Below are 101 examples of Wirral Labour / Tory / LibDem scandals, abuse of disabled people, corruption, lies, cover-ups, distortions, conflicts of interest, whitewash investigations, kickbacks, cronyism, control of the local media, gags, bumper pay-offs and clean bills of health to the guilty … and much more … all gathered over the last 10 years.

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment