As you can see here in this article the Connecticut FOIA Commissioner can rely upon the REQUESTER being deemed vexatious, which completely contradicts with the UK FOIA which states it MUST be the request that is vexatious and NOT the requester.
___________________________________________
https://www.foiaadvisor.com/home/2018/6/21/foia-commentary-vexatious-requesters
Wirral In It Together 
Richard Bailey ICO Solicitor
Dear Sir
Please see the following article from Elizabeth Denham in which she exported to Connecticut StateUSA in 2018. I consider this to be Duff Information because it clearly states the REQUESTERS can be deemed vexatious not the request. I would envisage such Legal Documents will have been approved by the ICO Chief Monitoring Officer, which I understand is you Mr Bailey,As you are aware this exported material was derived from the Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent BS which is still Navigating the UK Legal System..Why on earth would you wish to export the Dransfield Case to the Yanks when you are fully aware the UK FOI clearly states it MUST be the request which must be held vexatious not the REQUESTER.I would be grateful for clear documented evidence of who,when where this was approved before exporting to the USA. If necessary,please treat this as a FOIAHow many other USA states have you conned into purchasing the Dransfield Vexatious BS. Indeed how many other Countries have you CONNED into buying this Vexatious BS.. You knew or you should have known the situation ref REQUESTER or REQUEST. I consider this to be serious egregious conduct by you ,hence, I have included the Speaker of the House,my MP and Local Police in my mailing list. Your position is now untenable and I expect you to resign soonest.
Could you please advise me which other states if any this false information was exported,
This vexatious BS was exported to the USA by Eleizabeth Denham in 2018 and Connecticut was the first state to use it, As you can see here in this article the Conniecticut FOIA Commissioner can rely on the REQUESTER being deemed vexatious which is a complete contradiction to the UK FOIA which states it MUST be the request as vexatious NOT the requester.No person applying a right and proper mind could export such legal advice to a 3rd party Country. Could it be your cognitive state and capacity was impaired or was it simply chocolate poisoning .I am sure you are aware the Australian Attorney General has recently abolished the FOIA for the abject failures and corruption of the Aussie Tribunal system. I live in hope the Appropriate Authorities in the UK will take similar actions. My recommendation would be to sack the Senior Board at the ICO and a Number of Corrupt Judges at the UT and replace them with Dr Reuben Kirkhamd and Alan M Dransfield . UMr Bailey,you have no alternative than resign your position NOW,I look forward to your response.With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
___________________________________________https://www.foiaadvisor.com/home/2018/6/21/foia-commentary-vexatious-requesters
LikeLike
Just emailed this to the US Federal Information Commissioner.
————————————————————————–
Clare Martorana
US Federal Information Commission.
Dear Clare
In 2018, the then UK Information Commission Elizabeth Denham sold Connecticut State with some information regarding Vexatious Exemptions. She knew or she should have known that she was selling diss and misinformation. In particular Ms Denham claimed that Connecticut State could claim the requester could be deemed vexatious which is the complete reverse of the UK FOIA 2000 which clearly states it MUST be the request to be vexatious not the requester. I understand that Ms Denham sold this VEXATIOUS Silver Bullet to several US states but I am unable to give the exact state.
I look forward to your response
With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield
FOI Campaigner and Social Watchdog.
LikeLike