My fellow Wirral whistleblower Nigel Hobro – of WirralBiz infamy – the infamy belonging to Enterprise Solutions (NW) Limited, WirralBiz‘s parent organisation (strike off due) – has been in touch with what could one day amount to a ground-breaking proposal.
Please read on:
Salve Paul,In 2014 I had occasion to be referred to Ingeus on the Work scheme program. Basically I attended on interview but found work and I was for two years plagued by Ingeus for contact.It struck me that the urgency of their phone calls, their attendance at my house TWICE might indicate, rather like Wirralbiz, that they be tempted to cheat a la A4e.I asked DWP for the personal details of any claims made by Ingeus on my account-since they only had one initial interview. I will receive the data on 19th April as per the mailed letter to me from DWP.It struck me that these ridiculous schemes “Back to work” etc would be stopped in their tracks by each individual unwillingly subjected to them requesting their personal data.DWP would think twice about contracting such organisations, and the same be deterred from fraud, should each person request the data by FOI.*A kind of Gandhi-like revoltVale
*Nigel placed his request on 7th March 2017 via the whatdotheyknow.com website. Staff at WDTK correctly concealed it from public view as it contained personal information, and were kind enough to relay it onwards to the DWP as a ‘personal data’ submission.
So rather than be placed at the mercy of the DWP – like many unfortunate people are – and its globally untrusted / untrustworthy partner organisations, Nigel set about taking a measure of control back – and gaining some leeway for himself.
He’d lodged what is commonly known as a Data Protection Act “Subject Access Request” – albeit originally via an FOI channel – which is now with the serried ranks of gatekeeping data professionals at Ingeus – all in accordance with the DPA 1998 – in order to gain access to a specific part of the personal data and information that they hold on him.
And upon reading Nigel’s message just once, we can’t deny the fact he appeared to come in for special attention can we readers, what with more than one home visit?
In other words, the kind of costly attention which was probably motivated by the securing of a financial incentive into the groaning Ingeus coffers when the time arrived.
That’s how these things are arranged sadly. It’s very succinctly referred to in certain classic literature as “getting one’s pound of flesh”.
Money men will move mountains when motivated by worship of Mammon.
And data controllers in their service, i.e. the public (and private) bodies subject to this law have a clear statutory obligation to respond and provide a data subject’s personal data within 40 days.
There is no getting out of it and nowhere to hide, unless you are a clear and present threat to the reputation of an employer council – and mountains are moved to prevent you, like I once was. But in normal circumstances they are required to cough up.
Imagine if one day, a powerful movement was created and set into process, whereby just 25% of hitherto targeted and oppressed unemployed citizens, singled out for ongoing abuse and detriment, turned the tables on their oppressors and bound them up in the minutiae of responding in detail to a Subject Access Request for every single individual – all justified – not vexatious – for serious purpose – all done for correct and noble reasons and fully in keeping with their statutory rights and the law of the land?