https://pinecast.com/listen/70558bbc-fc15-4384-b4f5-46057848c8de.mp3 If the video above does not play, please try on our social media channels Bitchute / Odysee / Rokfin In this clip from TCR Live #124, Derrick Broze shares his latest investigation into the adoption firm, Bethany Christian Services. Derrick has spoken with sources who have been directly impacted by BCS. He shares how…

Exposing Bethany Christian Services’ History of Negligence and Manipulation

https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/uk-column-news-extra

Being Paid to Promote Vaccines is Against the Law

Their comfy doctor salary wasn’t enough? Had to propagandize on the side

MERYL NASS

MAY 17

https://open.substack.com/pub/merylnass/p/celebrity-doctors-being-paid-to-promote?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

THE CORBETT REPORT

MAY 17

https://open.substack.com/pub/corbettreport/p/international-law?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

https://off-guardian.org/2024/05/17/101-things-not-to-do-before-you-die/

https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/uk-column-news-extra/uk-column-news-extra-17th-may-2024

Please see para 14/15 which relies on Dransfield vexatious BS

Objective v Subjective.

It is fairly apparent to me that the ICO and FTT/UT Judges are not familiar with the difference between OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE.

Ditto for Politicians. The Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent was obviously a decision reached by the ICO and Court of Appeal via a subjective mindset. It stinks of corruption and should not be allowed to be the Court Precedent for vexatious cases.

Alan M Dransfield