Kamala Harris has absolutely no interest in doing any of these recommendations. Maybe she’ll adopt my plan instead? What do you think?

Steve Kirsch

Sep 7

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/rfk-jrs-12-part-plan-to-make-america?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/watch-telly-its-absolutely-bloody-29886667

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Rusere Shoniwa

Sep 7

https://open.substack.com/pub/plagueonbothhouses/p/uk-geoengineering-the-chemtrail-paper-8c7?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

Application Reference Number: ANTX/24/00984

Application Type: Prior Approval of Telecommunications PD

Proposal: 20m monopole, 6no. antenna, 1no. 0.3m dish, 3no. cabinets, 1no. meter cabinet and ancillary development. 

Applicant: CO/AGENT Cornerstone

Agent: Niamh Mullan (WHP Telecoms Ltd )

Location: Woodhey Grass Verge On Town Lane, Higher Bebington, Wirral, CH63 5JB

Ward: Bebington

Wirral Council were notified in late April 2024 that sections of the National Planning Policy Framework – a government guidance document – had been doctored, submitted to the council, and changed in a way which would unfairly help the applicants to avoid having to consult with the staff and governors of nearby schools.

A subsequent Council investigation conducted by Wirral Council Principal Lawyer Paul Martin made a staggering omission. Despite being informed in detail by a member of Wirral Residents Association about the above doctoring of government text, Mr Martin failed abysmally and did not include it in his investigation.

And now, the above application – which involves a mast being installed near to schools – and which was dated three months after the council had been informed, also features the same doctored text…!

Despite Paul Martin’s assurance to Mr Cook that all was well, that there had been ‘innocent errors’ (thousands of them, all across the country), that Wirral Council would amend its systems and rule out any future bogus safety certificates involving companies which had been dissolved NINE YEARS AGO … we are still being impacted by what could be the same fraudulent conduct on the part of the planning applicants.

Once again, in the above Town Lane, Higher Bebington mast application, government wording has been altered from ‘near a school or college’ to ‘within a school or college’, removing one of the obstacles to success, i.e. having to consult.

Thanks to Paul Martin’s failure, it seems the planning applicants haven’t been contacted and cautioned about the impact of this potential fraud. Are the council running scared? Is this quite deliberate, or are they just deeply incompetent?

And what about the safety of Wirral’s schoolchildren?

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

The evidence is crystal clear. However, people in Singapore are completely oblivious to the genocide.

Steve Kirsch

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/singapores-ministry-of-health-is?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

It looks like I may well have seriously misled you all in the last Slogpost – in which case, mea culpa….and herewith an explanation in mitigation. The theme of the piece was very much one of the US election scheduled to take place on November 5th 2024, using the slogan, ‘It’s all about November’. [Those […]

Ten days to treachery

https://expose-news.com/2024/09/07/it-was-all-a-lie-midazolam/

From a total of 16 local council Freedom of Information requests (scroll down) referring to bogus 5G safety certificates, I’ve had the best response from Sefton Council.

Here is a link to their reply, where four of my five questions have been addressed with the information requested and links to the planning portal. The other 15 councils have basically been evasive or shut up shop and either told me they don’t have the information or the time / resources to address it.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bogus_5g_mast_safety_certificati/response/2753447/attach/html/2/List%20of%20applications.csv.html

The plan of attack now is to appeal the Kingston Upon Thames Council case to the Information Commissioner quoting Sefton’s full response and asking why Kingston council chose not to respond in full in the same way Sefton did.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0mn714gr1no