UPDATED ~ Lies, Damned Lies and Machinations…

A recent article in the Wirral News (a paper with no hint of Wirral Council scandal between its obedient pages since, er…  February)

…tells us that the “What Really Matters” survey is going really well.  Councillor Musprattt reports on progress:

“I think the response is excellent so far, a credit to Wirral residents and Wirral Borough Council staff.”

Not to be outdone, Chief Executive Graham Burgess throws his hat into the ring:

“The initial response to the latest round of consultations has been very impressive. People are completing the questionnaire at a much faster rate than we have seen.”

However, we’re always a bit cagey, here at Wirral In It Together.

Naturally.

Following the liberties that were taken during W.R.M.1, we thought we’d step in, and perform a mathematical, and completely impartial analysis of the figures…

…which kept us occupied during lunch break today.  And here they are:

WIRRAL   COUNCIL’s  “What Really Matters   Survey” – the figures Wirral
News
Duration 14 days 8th October 2013
319,783 Office for National Statistics reported population of Wirral in   2011 census
Group 1 59,237 aged 65 or over
Group 2 203,161 aged 15 to 64
Group 3 57,385 aged 15 and under
319,783 (Sum of groups 1, 2 and 3)
262,398 (Sum of groups 1 and 2 – Total eligible to contribute to survey
 (aged over 15)
4,000 Number of Wirral people contributing to survey
258,398 Number of Wirral people not contributing to survey
1.5% percentage of eligible Wirral population contributing to survey
98.5% percentage of eligible Wirral population not contributing to survey

It’s not quite so “very impressive” now is it Mr Burgess?

In fact we’d say reality has been distorted… after being channelled through the clumsy council spin machine.

1.5 % can’t be seen as representative can it?  The article is horribly biased, and has fallen down badly we’d say… by failing to give ANY idea of proportion.  Or perspective.

Here, it’s explained that the ‘consultation’ will be going on for 12 weeks.  So let’s be completely open and businesslike about this and project forward.  Whilst doing this, we’ll also be generous and assume that the council will engage a further, ‘very impressive’ 1.5% of the Wirral population every 2 weeks.  If so, here’s the figure they’ll arrive at eventually:

16.5%

UPDATE ~ December 2013.  Oh dear.  They ended up with a miserable 2.3% –  No doubt, using our public money to fund it, this tiny figure will be spun and whipped up out of all proportion into some sort of compelling “Voice of the People that Cannot be Ignored” and the renewed justification for cutting and slashing quick, deep and hard.

Already, 100s upon 100s of street lights are being switched off on the strength of this tiny ‘mandate’, clearly inviting accidents, breaching the council’s duty of care to road users, and there’s no record of any consultation internally with the council’s street lighting professionals.

We’d observe, with far greater certainty (and with no need for a massaged, manipulated, mangled survey) that hundreds of thousands of Wirral residents, including a large majority of the ones who’ve undertaken the ‘consultation’, are dead against this programme of cuts.

And let’s face it, accuracy and honesty when engaging the public is after all…  “What Really Matters”.

About Wirral In It Together

Campaigner for open government. Wants senior public servants to be honest and courageous. It IS possible!
This entry was posted in FoI Requests, General and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s