https://beeley.substack.com/p/more-critical-perspectives-on-charlie?publication_id=716517&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

https://derrickbroze.substack.com/p/tcr-live-160-americans-are-being?publication_id=1295549&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/billionaire-bill-ackman-convened?publication_id=474765&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/new-documentary-dissent-into-madness?publication_id=725827&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Dear Commissioner,

I write to place on record a serious concern regarding my ongoing difficulties in exercising my information rights.

As you are aware, I am a party in the upcoming Upper Tribunal hearing on 30 September 2025 (case reference: UA-2024-001149-GIA, Dr Reuben Kirkham & Alan Dransfield v Information Commissioner).

In order to prepare my submissions, I have lodged a number of Subject Access Requests (SARs) with the ICO concerning my data and the handling of my Freedom of Information matters.

Despite statutory obligations under the UK GDPR and the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the ICO has failed to provide the requested data. This failure has directly hindered my ability to prepare and participate effectively in the above hearing.

I contend that this obstruction amounts to an unlawful act and may constitute a breach of section 77 FOIA, which makes it an offence for any person to conceal, alter, destroy or otherwise withhold information with the intention of preventing disclosure.

I therefore request: Immediate disclosure of all outstanding personal data held by the ICO relating to my SARs.

Confirmation of what steps the ICO will take to ensure my participation in the 30 September hearing is not prejudiced.

A clear statement of the ICO’s position in relation to potential breaches of section 77 FOIA.

For transparency, I am copying this letter to the Upper Tribunal (AAC), so that the Court is fully aware of the prejudice I am facing,

Yours sincerely,

Alan M Dransfield

http://paulcardin.substack.com

The Sun, The Mail, The Standard, The Mirror and Starmer will be delighted watching the hateful division they’ve caused.

The fake LEFT Versus RIGHT clown show is still GOING STRONG !!!

Take your pick…

1. Raise your flags, or…

2. Raise your consciousness

Both options are mutually exclusive.

http://paulcardin.substack.com

https://orgoneandconsciousness.substack.com/p/the-8-fold-path-of-compu-buddha?publication_id=2829316&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Neck Shot and Hand Grip

Charlie Kirk, after being shot, held onto his microphone for a couple of seconds until just before the camera panned away…

A person shot in the neck would likely lose the ability to hold any object in their hand immediately. The injury typically causes rapid loss of consciousness due to massive blood loss, damage to the spinal cord, or disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to the body going limp. The severe trauma, including potential damage to the spinal cord which controls signals from the brain to the body, would result in an immediate loss of muscle control and posture.

The neck contains vital structures like the carotid arteries and the spinal cord. A gunshot wound can cause catastrophic blood loss from major vessels, leading to hypovolemic shock and rapid unconsciousness.

Damage to the spinal cord in the neck can sever the connection between the brain and the body, causing paralysis and an immediate loss of the ability to maintain posture or grip objects.

The intense pain and shock from the injury, combined with the sudden drop in blood pressure and oxygen to the brain, would prevent any conscious effort to hold onto an object.

Even if the person remained conscious for a brief moment, the physical trauma and neurological damage would make it impossible to maintain a grip.

AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.

http://paulcardin.substack.com