Wirral In It Together

https://off-guardian.org/2024/08/11/eating-ze-bugs-is-vegan-what-the-rise-ento-veganism-really-means/

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/wirral_council_investigation_int

We won’t be taking the assurances of a telecoms company – CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Ltd – or their client – United Living – who appear to be claiming to have made the same ‘innocent error’ hundreds and hundreds of times ALL OVER THE UNITED KINGDOM.

See these freedom of information requests to 15 different councils where exactly the same ‘innocent errors’ occurred time and time again…!

It looks like Wirral Council are happy to accept the word of their client telecoms companies, but speaking for ourselves, we’ll be waiting for a judge to examine all the circumstances before delivering a verdict, and NOT relying on the word of salaried players on the inside who have a (dangerous) agenda to fulfil.

We’ll also be requesting an internal review because most of our points have been ignored.

Here’s the correspondence that’s been supplied to us (identifying names redacted), sent between Wirral Council, CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Ltd (and their client United Living).

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>  
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 6:13 PM 
To: xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx> 
Cc: . <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> 
 
Subject: Application for prior approval for 15m high telecommunications mast at Arrowe Park Road, Arrowe Park,
Wirral – ref ANTX/22/00211. Issue with Certificate of Conformity 
 
Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
I am writing to you regarding the above application which was allowed by appeal in February 2024. 
 
It has come to our attention that the Certificate of Conformity which was submitted as required with the prior approval application was submitted in the name of Three UK Ltd. 
 
Three UK Ltd had disbanded as an organisation prior to the submission of the prior approval application.  Therefore it is a matter of serious concern about the validity of the Certificate of Conformity.   
 
I am writing to you, now this matter has been drawn to our attention so that the Council can satisfy itself that there were no fraudulent intentions in the making of the application.  As such I would request that you provide an explanation regarding why the Certificate of Conformity was submitted in this way and ask
that you provide a ‘compliant’ Certificate of Conformity for the 5G equipment which has been installed within 14 days of the date of this email. 
 
If you wish to discuss this matter or if you no longer represent the applicant, please contact me or my colleague xxxxxxxxxxxx to clarify any outstanding matters and / or provide contact details for the applicant. 
 
Kind regards 
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Assistant Director Chief Planner 
Regeneration and Place 
0151 691 8240 

From: <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>  
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 8:56 AM 
To:. <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>; <xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx> 
Cc:. <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx> 
 
Subject: WIR23134 RE: Application for prior approval for 15m high telecommunications mast at Arrowe Park Road, Arrowe Park, Wirral – ref ANTX/22/00211. Issue with Certificate of Conformity 
 
EXTERNAL EMAIL:  Don’t click links or open attachments unless the content is expected and known to
be safe.  
 
Hi xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
I will revert to our clients here. 
 
Hi xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
Please note the below re the ICNIRP here. 
 
One for Three to come back on. 
 
All the best 
 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx FRICS (Registered Valuer) 
Managing Director, Dot Surveying Ltd 
 
Suite 41, 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh, EH6 5NP 
M: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx or P: 0345 340 5456  
xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx  
www.dotsurveying.co.uk  
[currently working from home, so please contact me should you require a postal address] 

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 1:44 PM 
To: <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>; . <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> 
Cc:. <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>; <xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx> 
 
Subject: RE: WIR23134 RE: Application for prior approval for 15m high telecommunications mast at 
Arrowe Park Road, Arrowe Park, Wirral – ref ANTX/22/00211. Issue with Certificate of Conformity 
 
Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
Thank you for your email – I have forwarded your concerns over to my client for comment. I will come back to you in due course. 
 
Kind regards,

From:<xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx> 
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 4:08 PM 
To:<xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>;. <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Cc:. <xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>; <xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx>

Subject: RE: WIR23134 RE: Application for prior approval for 15m high telecommunications mast at Arrowe Park Road, Arrowe Park,
Wirral – ref ANTX/22/00211. Issue with Certificate of Conformity 

Dear xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

I have contacted my client for comment – please see their response below – for completeness please see amended ICNIRP Certificate to update your documents. 

It was an innocent error that the planning application and the ICNIRP certificate referred to Three UK instead of CK Hutchison Networks  (UK) Limited, but a reasonable person would be able to confirm that the name used (Three UK Limited) is a reference to the entity who trade as “Three UK”, Hutchison 3G Limited. Especially given the other documents submitted as part of the planning application at question. CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Limited is on the Ofcom register of persons with powers under the 
Electronic Communications Code. 

The application and the ICNIRP certificate being issued in the incorrect entity name does not invalidate the application or the ICNIRP certificate. The only requirement is that the site has a declaration that it is ICNIRP compliant. The fact that it is in the name of another entity is irrelevant as the ICNIRP, and planning application, relates to the land and development not  the applicant. As such the declaration is valid if it is made in good faith by an appropriate professional, which was the case in relation to the planning 
application at question. 

CK Hutchison Networks (UK) Limited and Cignal Infrastructure UK Limited are the same entity (the latter being their current name, the former their previous name). Ofcom have now updated the code operator register to reflect this – please see following link – 
Register of persons with powers under the Electronic Communications Code – Ofcom 

I do hope the above is satisfactory and closes out our business. However, if you do require anything further please do not hesitate to contact me.

Kind regards, 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Acquisition Manager 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
E xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xx.xx  

Disclaimer  
 
unitedliving.co.uk  

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>  
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2024 8:31 PM 
To: xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx; xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx>; <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx> 
Subject: FW: WIR23134 RE: Application for prior approval for 15m high telecommunications mast at Arrowe Park Road, Arrowe Park, Wirral – ref ANTX/22/00211. Issue with Certificate of Conformity 
 
Hello all, 
 
We have an amended certificate as attached and an explanation. 
 
I’ve not responded, not even acknowledged which feels terribly rude but I wanted to check with you xxxxxxxxx what to do next….. 
 
xxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Assistant Director Chief Planner 
Regeneration and Place 
xxxxxxxxxxx 

AMENDED CERTIFICATE PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO OUR FOI REQUEST:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/wirral_council_investigation_int/response/2720701/attach/html/3/WIR23134%20ICNIRP%20CERT%20C.pdf.html

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

https://swentr.site/russia/602461-znpp-ukraine-attack/

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/nhs-tells-staff-ask-men-070616978.html

Video Production by Sarah Abushar

Michel Chossudovsky

Aug 10

https://open.substack.com/pub/michelchossudovsky/p/more-than-100-days-and-75-years-of?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b9xiw

JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me