Page 7, Issue 55, The Light Newspaper | Clear Thinking is Critical | Toolkit For Making Better Decisions in Age of Misinformation

THERE are many of us who used to think that governments and media would keep us informed of important information, but we now find ourselves questioning that assumption and finding it to be false in many instances. It is an example of the vital importance of critical thought. Chances are that you remember the moment when your perspective shifted; when a long-held belief no longer made sense. For some, these moments can lead to difficult consequences – losing friends, alienating family members, even facing professional setbacks. So how can we avoid these traps in the future? How can we ensure that we’re making decisions based on reality, not on assumptions or misinformation?

Let’s test your thinking with a simple riddle. A father and son are involved in a tragic accident. The father dies, and the son is rushed into surgery. The surgeon looks at the boy and says: ‘I can’t operate on him, he’s my son.’ How is this possible? Believe it or not, only 15 per cent of people get this right. But why? Our unconscious beliefs, biases and processes cannot be switched off and most will realise only at the end that they have misinterpreted the information and need to re-read it, consciously, critically thinking. The surgeon is, of course, the boy’s mother. It illustrates how easily our judgment can be clouded and keep us from seeing the truth until we pause and think critically.

At its core, critical thinking is the skill of analysing and evaluating information to make sound decisions. It’s a mental toolkit that helps us make better choices, solve problems more effectively, and understand the world with greater clarity. We live in a world where media outlets, social networks, and even political leaders constantly bombard us with news and opinion, often in biased, selective, and self-serving ways. How do we filter out the noise and understand what’s truly important? How do we act in light of reason and sound evidence, rather than being manipulated by political and media elites? How do we make our informed opinions count, and build a truly free and selfgoverning society, even though many aspects of our lives seem to be dictated by states and giant corporations? Could critical thinking be the antidote to the trends in society towards technocracy, mind-numbing consumerism, authoritarian governance, and political polarisation? This is where your ability to think critically becomes vital – not just for personal growth, but for the health of your community, neighbourhood, city and/or nation. An effective and resilient political system depends on a strong civil society.

Civil society is strongest when individuals challenge assumptions, question the status quo, and demand truth and truthfulness from each other and from their institutions. Critical thinking is essential for participating in this process and for creating a society where freedom of thought can thrive. So, how can you sharpen your critical thinking?

Here are some powerful, research-backed strategies that can help:

1. Ask the right questions: when encountering new information, resist the urge to accept it at face value. Who is presenting the information? Do they have an interest in presenting it from a biased perspective? What evidence supports it? Are there alternative explanations you haven’t considered?

2. Look for hidden assumptions: every contribute to discussions that shape a better society. As the cornerstone of a thriving civil society, it’s not just about personal growth – it’s about creating a community that values truth, freedom, and reason.

3. Recognise your own biases: we all have biases whether we acknowledge them or not. The key is to recognise them and actively seek out different viewpoints. Being open to change when presented with new evidence is one of the hallmarks of critical thinking.

4. Evaluate sources carefully: with the rise of fake news and clickbait, it’s more important than ever to question the credibility of your sources. Research shows that people are more likely to believe information from familiar sources, even if it’s false. By checking the reliability of your sources, you can make better decisions.

5. Draw conclusions based on evidence, not emotion: critical thinking requires assessment of facts and evidence, not just relying on emotional reactions. The more you base your conclusions on reliable evidence, the more precise your thinking will be. By honing these skills, we can navigate life’s challenges more effectively and

contribute to discussions that shape a better society. As the cornerstone of a thriving civil society, it’s not just about personal growth – it’s about creating a community that values truth, freedom, and reason.

In a world full of manipulation, propaganda, and media spin, exercising critical thinking allows us to challenge those who spread misinformation and protect the integrity of our democratic systems. This is why it’s so important to invest time and energy into developing these skills. They’re not just useful for individual decisions – they are the foundation of a society where rational discourse can flourish and the public is empowered to make informed choices. If you want to thrive in a world where information is constantly changing, you need to sharpen your critical thinking skills. By doing so, you can contribute to a more informed, free-thinking society – one that challenges false narratives and promotes progress.

● For more insights and techniques, please visit: https://reachingpeople.net/


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Page 6, Issue 55, The Light Newspaper | Net Zero: A Pointless Crusade | Bad Data and Faulty Models Leading us up the Garden Path Again

THE political project, UK Net Zero by 2050, was undemocratically adopted by the UK government in 2019. Yet the science of so-called greenhouse gases is well known and there is no reason to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), or nitrous oxide (N2O) because of radiation absorption rates. Adding to or removing these naturally occurring gases from the atmosphere will make little difference to the temperature or the climate. Water vapour (H2O) is claimed to be a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO2, CH4 or N2O, but cannot be regulated because it occurs naturally in vast quantities. Because of the nature of absorption of infrared radiation, most of the temperature change has already occurred, and increasing CO2, CH4, N2O concentrations will not lead to significant changes in air temperatures. This is because absorption is logarithmic (Beer-Lambert Law of attenuation) – a law of diminishing returns. And there are many other variables which affect temperatures.

The ocean is a huge heat sink (carrying heat away from the source) which moderates the global surface air temperature and absorbs CO2 (Henry’s Law). Cloud cover can have significant effects on air temperatures and provide negative feedback in the climate system, stabilising the temperature to some extent. And changes in the sun and solar radiation can have significant effects. All of this science has been empirically derived, either in the laboratory (e.g. Henry’s Law, Beer-Lambert Law of attenuation), observed in reliable proxies (solar cycles) or by direct observation (e.g. changes in the sun, changes in sunspots or changes in solar ‘wind’ radiation). These and many other influences on the surface air temperature of the Earth are not captured by the climate modellers, and so, faulty, inaccurate models are produced which provide projections (not forecasts) far into the future where uncertainties are huge.

However, if the models are so poorly designed, the output is not likely to be able to predict anything realistic. The real problem is that the data for these faulty models also suffers from poor quality, unjustified data adjustments, infilling missing data to make the data fit the theory, and merging of known poorquality weather-station data with good quality data. Tampering with data is fraudulent, and the known bad data should have been excluded, but this is apparently routinely used in climatology and raises questions from scientists with concerns about the climate change narrative. For example, some 96 per cent of U.S. weather stations were found to be incorrectly or poorly sited (e.g. near artificial sources of heat such as air conditioning outlets, on concrete pads, close to buildings or car parks in urban heat islands) leading to artificial increases in measured temperatures. Loss of Russian weather stations from the data set, instrument changes, relocation of weather stations, population growth and land-use changes artificially increased calculated global average surface-air temperatures.

These are basic mistakes in data collection, data handling and data analysis, and they are misleading. Yet most of our politicians seem unable to grasp these important basic scientific facts and simply concentrate on very expensive, unreliable, variable and intermittent so-called renewables and the non-existent hydrogen energy system by spending £22bn on carbon capture and storage. Is this the hole in the finances Labour spoke about? Net Zero is a pointless crusade which will achieve nothing for the climate but gives the government an excuse to harm our farmers, damage our electrical supply system and hike our energy bills, hurting us all. It is time for a rethink on Net Zero because the science does not support it in any way.

● Dr Mike Simpson has a PhD in physical chemistry.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Page 5, Issue 55 of The Light Newspaper – Debunking Fossil Fuels Myth | Hidden Science: Oil Produced Without Organic Matter by Sally Dean

Debunking fossil fuels myth

Hidden science: Oil produced without organic matter by SALLY DEAN

I READ an article by Carol Brouillet in Off-Guardian recently and was intrigued by what she had to say about Marijn Poels, a Dutch documentary filmmaker. Carol talked in glowing terms about his latest film The Primordial Code The Burning Essence. Her review immediately resonated with me. She said the film ‘looks deeply into where we have come from, who we are and where we are going, as a species.’ So having watched this beautiful film, I was inspired to look at the rest of his output.

In 2018, he released The Uncertainty Has Settled, in which he investigates the roots of agriculture and how globalisation and climate politics have created radical changes in modern times. As the film progresses, Poels starts to question the green agenda and pulls together arguments from both sides. It is a well-balanced exploration but by the end of the film, he realises that the justification for a transition to ‘alternative’ energy sources is based on a false premise. His final interview is with Prof. Vladimir Kutcherov, a Swedish-based Russian geologist who introduces Poels to the theory of the abiotic origin (i.e. not organic in nature) of oil and gas. At this point my ears pricked up, as it took me back to something a friend – someone who had worked as an engineer in the oil industry – had said a few years ago: “We all knew that oil was self-replicating.”

Wanting to know more at the time, I acquired a book by Dr Jerome Corsi, published in 2012 entitled: The Great Oil Conspiracy – How the US Government Hid the Nazi Discovery of Abiotic Oil from the American people. Corsi claims Germany’s fuel requirements began to move in the opening decade of the 20th century from coal to petroleum. Without its own reserves of oil, the country could not progress as a viable industrial economy. So, in the early 1920s, two German chemists, Franz Fishcher and Hans Tropsch, replicated the natural process of oil production, which they believed occurred under intense pressure in the deep layers of the Earth. What became known as the Fischer-Tropsch process enabled Germany to produce synthetic oil from coal. At the start of the war, Germany had 14 synthetic fuel plants in full operation and six more under construction, producing approximately campaign with Dino the Dinosaur as its logo. At the 1964 New York World’s Fair, Sinclair’s Dinoland exhibit was one of the main attractions, and here Dino and eight more (life-sized) representations of other species of dinosaurs were exhibited and animated. Dino is just as popular today and his image appears not to have changed since the 1930s. The myth that oil and gas are fossil fuels derived from former plant and animals/ dinosaurs persists, and the public are still led to believe that they are scarce resources.

Over in England in 1982, the astronomer Fred Hoyle made his own opinion known when he said: “The suggestion that petroleum might have arisen from some transformation of squashed fish or If oil is abiotic, then was ‘Peak Oil’ [the idea that it’s running out) just a marketing scheme? All hydrocarbon fuels are produced naturally in the mantle of the Earth on a continuous basis without the involvement of any organic material 95 per cent of the aviation fuel used by the Luftwaffe. Corsi says that ‘what remains even today locked away within the Fischer-Tropsch equations is an understanding that all hydrocarbon fuels are abiotic in origin, produced naturally in the mantle of the earth on a continuous basis without the involvement of any organic material whatsoever…it presents a direct challenge to the fossil fuel theory of the origin of oil.’

As an aside, a film called The Formula was released in 1980 starring Marlon Brando and George C Scott. The brief synopsis on IMDb reads: ‘The synthetic fuel production formula, invented by the Nazis at the end of World War Two, is sought by some who aim to sell it, and by others who wish to destroy it.’ Hidden in plain sight? In Russia, an outspoken proponent of the abiogenic origins of oil was Nikolai Kudryavtsev, a Russian petroleum geologist. By 1951, he had articulated what today has become known as the Russian/Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins.

Dozens of Russian scientists have followed his lead, stating that the chemical processes by which hydrocarbons are produced were a natural product of the Earth itself, manufactured at deep levels where there never were any plants or animals. They concluded that abundant oil could be found in Russia if only wells were drilled deep enough. Two years after my initial investigation, I am listening to Poels talking to Kutcherov and my interest in this subject is reignited. Investigating further, I stumble upon Colonel L Fletcher Prouty, a Pentagon insider with 23 years’ military experience who, in various interviews following his retirement revealed some of the inner workings of the American government’s clandestine operations. He was fictionalised as ‘Mister X’ in Oliver Stone’s 1991 film JFK. In a 1994 interview, he emphatically states that oil is a self-replicating substance, it is the second most prevalent liquid on Earth, and no fossils were required to make it.

He goes on to state that no fossil is found below 16,000 ft and drilling for oil generally starts at 30,000 ft.

The concept of fossil fuels being derived from formerly living matter was cemented in the minds of the American public by oil companies such as Sinclair Petroleum. In the 1930s, it developed an advertising biological detritus is surely the silliest notion to have been entertained by substantial numbers of persons over an extended period of time.” Returning to Poels’s interview with Kutcherov, which is where I began, the Russian geologist explains, with the help of a flip chart and pen, how infinite quantities of oil and gas are produced 100 to 200km below the surface of the Earth. Poels, a little bemused, states: “We could live in balance and peace with oil…which would economically and politically change the world on such a big scale I can’t imagine.” Kutcherov pauses for a moment and then says: “Correct.” Poels then asks: “Why am I not seeing this or reading this in the mainstream media?” Kutcherov smiles: “Your question is your answer.”

FURTHER READING The Deep Hot Biosphere: The Myth of Fossil Fuels, Thomas Gold Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil, Jerome R Corsi and Craig R Smith The Great Oil Conspiracy: It has been known since the end of WWII that oil is not a fossil fuel; it is abiotic: https://tinyurl.com/48m369ua L. Fletcher Prouty: Oil is not a fossil fuel; it is the second most prevalent liquid on Earth: https://tinyurl.com/ysnvtn7c

Please pass The Light on when you’ve read it


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Charted: The Growth of Industrial Robots by Country

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-growth-of-industrial-robots-by-country/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, One Year On

https://dhughes.substack.com/p/covid-19-psychological-operations-06c?publication_id=594370&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Will criminal cases break the wall of the PREP Act aka “license to kill”?

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/will-criminal-cases-break-the-wall?publication_id=870364&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Comments – ‘If The World Hates You, Remember It Hated Me First’ | Gemma O’Doherty

https://gemmaodoherty.substack.com/p/if-the-world-hates-you-remember-it/comments?comments=true

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What is the Pandemic Agreement really about?

https://onwardpod.substack.com/p/what-is-the-pandemic-agreement-really?utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Autism Solved by September! – New World Next Week

https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/autism-solved-by-september-new-world?publication_id=725827&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Yes -The Israeli Government Created Hamas

https://iaindavis.substack.com/p/yes-the-israeli-government-created?triedRedirect=true

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment