The alleged “Vexatious” Exemptions now propping up the broken Freedom of Information Act 2000. A Brief History

Posted on September 2, 2021 by Wirral In It Together

Judge O’Conner, President of the Upper Tribunal

Unlawful Decision by Upper Tribunal Judge Nicholas Wikeley


Dear Sir,


The case in which I wish to draw your attention is GIA /3037/2013 which is now used as the Court Precedent  for all vexatious cases.

Thousands of Vexatious Cases are now archived in HMCTS and the ICO. My original FOIA request was deemed to be vexatious by the PA Devon County Council  DCC) because they claimed the subject of my FOIA request i.e. Lightning Protection Systems (LPS) on the Exeter Chiefs’ Rugby Bridge (ECRB) had been provisioned with state of the art LPS. Such statement could not be further from the truth.

Judge Wikely upheld the DCC Vexatious but obviously did not conduct any technical inquiry

I can now prove the ECRB was devoid of any LPS at the time of Hearing at the UT and Court of Appeal (EWCA 454 2015). Since 2013 the ICO have relied upon the Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent, I have now been banned from using the FOIA and I am the Court Precedent for all Vexatious Cases.

It is consistently obvious the Judge Wikely/ICO/Court of Appeal and other rogue PA are acting in concert to obstruct the FOI and to pervert the Court of Justice, which is a breach of section 77 of the said Act. I fully appreciate the time limits (2013) prevent you investigating the egregious conduct by Judge Wikeley inter alia, however, the Upper Tribunal are STILL using the Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent,hence, it is fairly obvious the UT and others are turning a blind eye to the Unlawful use of the Dransfield Vexatious Hogwash.

There is now PRIMA FACIE evidence available at my blog (ALAN DRANSFIELD BLOG) i.e. the As Built Health and Safety Files for the ECRB.

Notwithstanding the veracity of my allegation, the gravity of my claims behooves your office to carry out a full inquiry into the Conduct of Judge Wikeley. GIA/3037 is unfit for purpose, as is Judge Wikely.

Suggestions and recommendation:

1. Judge Wikeley should be put on gardening leave subject to investigation

2. Cease and desist from using the Dransfield Vexatious Court Precedent.

3. Each time the UT or ICO use the Dransfield Vexatious they deny the FOIA requester civil, legal and human rights.

With thanks
Yours sincerely
Alan M Dransfield

FOIA Campaigner and Social Watch dog

Unknown's avatar

About Wirral In It Together

Campaigner for open government. Wants senior public servants to be honest and courageous. It IS possible!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The alleged “Vexatious” Exemptions now propping up the broken Freedom of Information Act 2000. A Brief History

  1. Lindsay Fraser's avatar Lindsay Fraser says:
    May 21, 2024 at 11:57 am

    ICO Upper Tribunal Judge Nicholas Wikeley, the Ministry of Justice have confirmed, is not registered at the Ministry of Justice. His “President” on our international Criminal Prosecutions warnings, suddenly abdicated responsibilities to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, which has confirmed it has no remits to investigate Judge conduct, therefore is public deception. Although using the .gov, it is a discretionary private judge-club for corrupt judges to hide from accountability. Why are McKenna, Wikeley and Williams being Prosecuted at the U.N. ? Because Wikeley wrote that a victim of baby abduction for torture, with I.C.C. DIRECTIVES (to exhaust domestic remedies before proceeding) was quote “diatribe”, despite having the International Criminal Court’s Registrations document, and the victim who had already proven State child torture in a prohibited sterilisation experiment, at a U.N. Tribunal in New York, Wikeley wrote the victim trying to get appeal at ICO hiding of personal data evidence was a “scurrilous conspiracy theorist of no merit, not to be given a platform to disseminate such nonsense”, insults which were outside Wikeley’s remits anyway, apart from concealing ICO colluded corruption. Insult the I.C.C. as “diatribe” and see what the Judges say !! Wikeley and Williams have no criminal accountability in the U.K., so of course, they now face Prosecutions, no immunities, no time limits in State Crimes against Humanity, The Child, Denial of the Truth Crimes. Justice Williams, (MoJ) Wikeley’s abdicating to JCIO “President 2023” defended her non-MoJ ICO private judge Wikeley’s criminal conduct. They are worms in the woodwork, with many holes, of a justice system that habitually covers up State child torture, medical experiments and violent torture, where their Lord Chief Justice has kept her silence on our Indictment Notices, with the U.N. defining the U.K. as “The worst of industrialised nations for child abuse”. We, the international Prosecution team, are the spray to clean them out.

    Lindsay Fraser, one Prosecution Lawyer

    Like

    Reply
  2. Wirral In It Together's avatar Wirral In It Together says:
    May 21, 2024 at 8:31 pm

    Thank you Lindsay. This has been forwarded to Mr Dransfield who states that “it could not have come at a better time”.

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.