Say No to Digital ID – ACHES’s Substack

https://aches.substack.com/p/say-no-to-digital-id?publication_id=5148018&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Autism Industrial Complex Reigns Supreme in America


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

David v. Goliath: The Freedom of Information Truth Battle



http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You won’t believe in coincidences anymore after you watch this video on Charlie Kirk’s assassination | A Call For An Uprising



http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NOTHING’S CHANGED AT CORRUPTED WIRRAL COUNCIL. So let’s give this one from 2012 – thirteen long years ago – another airing …


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You’re being played…! This is the Turning Point for America. Disengage now before it’s too late


Transcript

YouTube says it has had enough of vaccine misinformation on its site

and false stories from phony sites to run circles around major news

outlets.

0:13Many people don’t know the difference

0:15between something real and something

0:17created to deceive them.

0:19Open your eyes.

0:21If you’ve ever had this feeling that

0:23something was terribly wrong with the

0:25world that we lived in, but you couldn’t

0:27figure out just what it was, then you’ve

0:29come to the right place. Secret

0:31societies, mystery religions, and the

0:34Illuminati have been controlling our

0:36reality since the beginning of time. But

0:39not anymore, because there is an

0:41awakening happening, and you are about

0:44to become a part of it. Wake up because

0:47this is a call for an uprising.

0:51A look at your screen. These are two of

0:53the photos that the FBI Salt Lake City

0:57just released. They say we’re asking for

0:59the public’s help identifying this

1:02person of interest in connection with

1:04the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at

1:06Utah Valley University. So, the FBI just

1:10releasing moments ago photos of the who

1:14they’re calling a person of interest in

1:16Charlie Kirk’s murder. You can see both

1:18of those different angles of this person

1:21of interest right here. Uh we were

1:23hearing initially that the person of

1:25interest they were looking for was

1:27wearing all black. And now we can see

1:29from these photos this person of

1:31interest wearing a black hat, a baseball

1:35cap with their eyes shielded with dark

1:38sunglasses and dark attire right here.

1:42So they’re asking for the public’s help

1:44in identifying this person of interest.

1:47They’re asking anyone to call 1 800 call

1:50FBI.

1:51This is a call for an uprising. Welcome

1:54to today’s show. As the suspense builds,

1:57the FBI has released a photo of the

2:01person of interest as the manhunt

2:03continues. The suspense is so important

2:05into sucking people into the psychosis.

2:08But before we get into details here

2:12about other narratives that we all have

2:14to pay attention to because this is

2:15everything to do with our rights. Our

2:16rights are being taken away from us

2:18because of events like this. If you’re

2:20falling into this because you’re turning

2:22on the media or the alt-right media or

2:24whatever other media you consume, pull

2:27yourself out of it. Stop being concerned

2:29as to whether or not this guy was shot

2:31and killed, if it was a false flag and

2:33he really was murdered or he wasn’t

2:34murdered because the outcome of that is

2:37the same. They are going to bring in

2:39change from this and the narrative

2:41that’s coming with the shooter and

2:42transgender ideologies and of course him

2:46being on the loose for so long and us

2:48not being able to apprehend him as fast

2:50and how biometrics would have saved the

2:51day. Those are things we have to pay

2:52attention to because it can affect your

2:53life every day. They want you

2:55emotionally sucked in. They want you

2:56thinking about his wife and his kids.

2:58That’s done by design. We’ll never know

3:00if he’s alive or dead really. But what

3:02we know is that this is a government

3:04operation very clearly. We have people

3:06out there saying it’s a false fight.

3:07they really killed him. He had turned on

3:08Israel. That’s fine if you want to

3:10believe that. There’s others like me who

3:12believe when he was rushed into that SUV

3:14that he was taken where everybody else

3:15goes to be unaccounted for over in

3:19Israel likely bunking up with Jeffrey

3:22Epstein and the other people who they

3:23fake kill off so that you emotionally

3:26get invested in their psychological

3:28operations. Pull yourself out. I

3:31understand it’s easy to get sucked in. I

3:33understand it’s easy to want to believe

3:34that the stuff you see on the news is

3:36real, but that’s how they get everybody.

3:38Look how people are reacting. Remind

3:39yourself of that. That these are

3:41controlled events. Do not worry about if

3:44the man was really killed or he wasn’t

3:45killed. It’s not about that. As crazy as

3:48that sounds, these are actors who are

3:50acting. They are unlikely taking one

3:52another out unless that person crosses

3:54another. Unless there is a bigger goal

3:56to achieve. And there is a bigger goal

3:58to achieve. these laws and rules are

3:59going to bring in, including red flag

4:01laws and biometric surveillance. So,

4:03come with me now. Pull yourself out.

4:05Take a deep breath. Okay, let’s look at

4:07this from a psychological standpoint.

4:10They’ve released the image of the

4:12shooter, right? He’s got a shirt. We see

4:14the American flag on it. Of course, we

4:16do. He’s wearing a shirt with the

4:17American flag. When we get a better look

4:19at the shirt, we’ll see what’s engraved

4:21inside of that American flag. But read

4:24between the lines here. That bear

4:25releases images of person of interest in

4:27the shooting. Authorities are asking for

4:29the public’s help in identifying the

4:31person as the manhunt for Kirk’s killer

4:34continues. A rifle and ammo were found.

4:37FBI releases images of person of

4:39interest. They announced a $100,000

4:41reward. So, they’re calling on the

4:43public to find this guy. People are

4:45going, “Does anybody know this guy’s on

4:48the loose?” And maybe potentially, which

4:50I doubt, but there’s always the

4:51potential that this guy goes and shoots

4:53somebody else because that would really

4:55be the the c the gr or whatever they

4:57call the cudigra of this if he goes and

4:59shoots somebody else because they didn’t

5:01apprehend him in time because this is

5:03about biometric surveillance. So if

5:05something happens with this guy,

5:06everyone’s going to blame the police and

5:08say they didn’t get him in time. They

5:09called in the people to help. Nobody

5:10could recognize him because he was in a

5:11costume. But you know what to recognize

5:12him? Facial recognition, right? And

5:15what’s that big beautiful bill all

5:17about? the big beautiful bill that

5:19Donald Trump passed and everybody was

5:21complaining, “Oh, what’s in the

5:22beautiful bill? How much tax money do we

5:24have to spend?” Nobody’s paying

5:25attention that the big beautiful bill

5:27was based off of AI surveillance,

5:31funding, biometric surveillance, and AI

5:34tech. Trump is all in on AI governance

5:37infrastructure. He shows you every day

5:40the Golden Dome he’s talking about

5:41building. It’s not a missile defense

5:43system. It’s surveillance 24/7. No

5:47escape. 1984.

5:50And just look at the stuff with

5:50Palunteer.

5:52Palunteer workers, former workers

5:54condemning the company’s work with Trump

5:56administration. Trump is in bed with

5:58Palunteer. Palunteer is the enemy of the

6:01state. They are the allseeing eye. They

6:04are big brother. And you’re going to

6:05hear more of Palunteer in the mainstream

6:07as they boo their boost their stock up

6:09because they want people to look at

6:11Palunteer as if it’s saving the day. And

6:13that’s what the conservatives are doing

6:14right now, right? How do we know they’re

6:16doing that? Well, because they’ve told

6:17us that ICE is using immigration OS by

6:21Palanteer, an AI system to track

6:23immigrants movements. And every day

6:24we’re hearing about how immigrants are

6:26getting deported. How they’re finding

6:27immigrants who are comm have already

6:29committed crimes, who are illegals, and

6:31they’re deporting them thanks to what?

6:32Thanks to tech, thanks to Big Brother,

6:34thanks to Palunteer. So, they’re

6:36applauding it. Now, just imagine we

6:38start shifting with this story towards

6:39that. We can’t find the shooter. Maybe

6:42we’ll call on Palunteer to put that

6:44image through their database and bring

6:46up the person of interest and who he is

6:49and then they’ll be able to go and

6:50apprehend him because that’s what it’s

6:52going to lead to. We’re going to hear

6:53about why it’s taking so long. There’s

6:55two reasons that it’s taking so long.

6:57One, it builds suspense which sucks

6:59people deeper into the psychosis. Number

7:01two, it’s giving people this feeling of

7:06why haven’t they caught him? What is the

7:08problem? We can we trust these people in

7:10the FBI? These same people, the ones

7:13against Trump, are they the ones who

7:15were trying to get him in prison? Maybe

7:17we need something faster and quicker.

7:19Cuz what if this guy goes and shoots

7:21another conservative speaker? Maybe he

7:23will. Maybe he has by the time this gets

7:25uploaded. Maybe it’ll already be news.

7:28Think about those things as we move

7:30forward. The tech giant Palunteer is

7:32helping the US government monitor its

7:34citizens. It wants to monitor its

7:38citizens. So, the buildup of suspense

7:40right now, if you look up anything, ask

7:42ask Google, ask uh Brave, ask whatever

7:45search engine you’re using, ask them

7:47about writing a story or a movie and how

7:49important the buildup of suspense is.

7:51Buildup of suspense significantly

7:54increases reader engagement, right? By

7:57creating tension, anxiety, emotional

7:59investment, making them eager to

8:00discover what happens next. Do you see

8:04the response that’s going on right now?

8:06Do you see it? Do you see how many

8:08people are losing their minds over this

8:10guy that they’ve never met because

8:12they’re in the internet psychosis, the

8:13social media psychosis, some guy they’ve

8:16only heard speak online that they think

8:17is their friend because he speaks like

8:19they do or talks like they do and he’s

8:21speaking for them, right? They are deep

8:23in the psychosis. Do you know how many

8:24people have come back to the website

8:26since this has happened? Because people

8:28are going, I need to find out what’s

8:30happening because of the suspense of it

8:32all, the buildup. Who’s behind it? Why

8:34did it happen? Is it real? Is it not?

8:36But most importantly to the, you know,

8:38the deep state, the big brother, this

8:40buildup of suspense brings people in.

8:43It’s basic psychology. It’s people who

8:45write books, who write movies, that’s

8:47what they do to you when you read a book

8:49of fiction or you watch a movie. The

8:52more there’s a buildup towards that end,

8:54that climax, the more engaged you are in

8:58the story. So that’s why all these

9:01headlines are saying things like manhunt

9:03underway for Gunman who killed Charlie

9:05Kirk. Manhunt continues, right?

9:07Everybody’s looking around going, “Where

9:08is this guy?” Oh, and then finally, they

9:11release an image of him. But before they

9:13release an image, they want to remind

9:14you of all these other things so they

9:15could build this up in your mind who

9:17they’re going to present to you as the

9:19shooter because, you know, without, you

9:21know, it’s very clear everybody out

9:23there already thinks that the shooter’s

9:24transgender, do they not? Well, that’s

9:26done by design, right? Kirk was

9:29answering a question about transgender

9:30mass shooters seconds before he was

9:32shot. They wanted you to know that right

9:34away. The first video I did on this, I

9:36played you the news clip. He was

9:38talking. We just got word Charlie Kirk

9:40has been shot. They said on Fox News,

9:43we just started getting word just a

9:46couple of moments ago. Um that Charlie

9:49Kirk has been shot. Uh we have very few

9:53details um so far coming in on this. Uh

9:56we’re dependent on witnesses at

10:00Okay.

10:02Utah Valley University. Um, and he was

10:07speaking in front of a crowd and in that

10:10moment, and correct me if I’m wrong, he

10:11was speaking about um, obviously trans

10:14issues in the country today. Uh, when a

10:17shot or shots rang out and we can now

10:20confirm via Jason Chaffitz, who was at

10:23the event uh, at Utah Valley University

10:26that shots rang out as Charlie was

10:28talking about transgender mass

10:30shootings. We just got word. Oh my

10:32goodness. And he was talking on stage

10:34and what he was talking about trans.

10:36Well, who cares about what he was

10:37talking about if he was just shot? Oh,

10:38you want everyone to know he was talking

10:40about transgender so that people are

10:42automatically in their head are saying

10:43the shooter is likely transgender. Well,

10:45transgender shooters are going after

10:47conservatives and kids in church, right?

10:50So, they wanted you to know that that’s

10:51what he was discussing. The irony of it

10:53all because it’s a scripted story. Then

10:55what do they tell you? The breakthrough

10:57in the hunt. A collegeage suspect. The

10:59media releases little info at a time,

11:01right? The media this morning starting

11:02reporting. It’s a college age suspect.

11:04Well, yesterday it was an old man,

11:06right? People weren’t reacting the way

11:07you would expect. They were just going,

11:09″Who is this old guy?” I didn’t cover it

11:11when I saw it because I was waiting

11:12because they have to cover it. So, you

11:13know where they’re going with it. They

11:16waited. They waited. People looked

11:18around. Who is it? Well, we do know he’s

11:20in college. He’s in college, right?

11:22Think about this whole setup that

11:23they’ve created over the last decade. It

11:25just started a decade ago with Charlie

11:27Kirk, the Steven Crowder, these guys who

11:30go on college campuses and get in

11:32people’s faces and debate them. Now,

11:34they’re not literally in their faces.

11:35There’s nothing wrong with having a

11:37debate, but this is a CIA operation.

11:38They’ve built this whole thing up and

11:40people see it and then they attend it.

11:42Look at the size of the crowds that are

11:43going to these things so they could

11:44debate these guys, but done by design.

11:48So, they want you to know it’s a college

11:50age kid. Kirk was talking about

11:52transgender. And then of course the next

11:54calling card of the government, they

11:56want you to know it was a high-powered

11:57rifle that was recovered. Well, that’s

11:59I’m shocked. I can’t believe it. I can’t

12:01believe it. I thought it was going to be

12:02a BB gun. Yeah, they recovered a

12:04highowered rifle. And then what they

12:06tell you next? No. They leaked the

12:08story. Can’t find the guy yet, but they

12:09want to build this suspense up in your

12:11mind. Well, the ammunition, this is from

12:13the Wall Street Journal, the ammunition

12:15in the shooting was engraved with

12:18transgender anti-fascist ideologies,

12:21right? You got to love how these guys

12:22leave their weapon behind too, right? I

12:25mean, is this is this classic? You know,

12:27I get it. If you get shot and killed or

12:29they supposedly off themselves, they

12:31leave their This guy just dropped his

12:32gun on the roof and ran. He didn’t

12:33think, hey, maybe I need this gun to

12:35protect myself or something like that.

12:36Maybe I can get rid of the gun so that

12:37if they arrest me, they can’t prove that

12:39I was a shooter because they couldn’t

12:40find the gun. That’s what we hear about

12:41crime shows, right? Oh, we found the

12:43guy. He’s definitely the guy, but we

12:44can’t find the weapon. We need that

12:46evidence. So, he just left the evidence

12:48for them, right? And I love this other

12:50notion of all these guys who want to go

12:51and do these things leaving calling

12:54cards, writing and engrave. Who ever has

12:55heard of such? How would you even

12:57engrave in a gun, right? I mean, how do

13:00you engrave in it? I mean, that’s a lot

13:01of work. So, they’re engraving in the

13:03gun. So, they want everyone in the media

13:04to talk. Of course, they are because

13:06it’s a government operation. So, they

13:08want you to know, is he a Democrat or a

13:10Republican? Well, they’re letting you

13:11know transgender. Okay, we know

13:12Democrats. Democrats are violent. We

13:14need to get their guns. We need to fight

13:16them. This is war. That’s the narrative

13:18that you’re hearing out there. And of

13:20course, there’s other things that

13:22trickle in as we continue to wait in

13:25suspense. Not that I’m suspenseful about

13:27it, but we know that it’s coming cuz

13:29this is how they work. This is when

13:30you’re not in the matrix. You watch and

13:32you know what’s coming. You could

13:33predict it. It’s a predictable system,

13:35right? How about guys like this? The

13:37quartering Justice for Charlie Kirk.

13:39This is all over Rumble. Rumble. I’m

13:40putting some of these videos up on

13:41Rumble because I’m trying to infiltrate

13:45the hive mind. I’m trying to get in

13:47there and get people to start thinking.

13:48They don’t want it. They want to believe

13:50that this is real. They want to believe

13:51that the stuff that they’re told is real

13:52is real. And that’s the problem. They

13:54don’t want you to question the news.

13:56That’s the only reason people like me

13:57are silenced. It’s it. Am I better than

13:59anybody else? It’s that mindset of

14:01talking about the news being

14:02manufactured directly from the MSAD.

14:05It’s more than Operation Mockingbird.

14:06It’s the stories themselves. It’s easy

14:08to get sucked in. You turn these stories

14:10on, of course you get sucked in. Oh,

14:12he’s got a wife and kids. Well, who

14:14wouldn’t get sucked in? You have to

14:15constantly remind yourself as if you

14:17were in, you know, a room with a

14:19psychologist or somebody who was trying

14:21to brainwash you, right? To stay awake,

14:24stay alert. Like say you got abducted in

14:25your room and they’re trying to

14:26brainwash you say, “Oh, don’t fall for

14:28it. Don’t fall for it.” That’s how you

14:29have to be 24/7 because the media is

14:31constant. They’re constantly coming

14:32after us. So here’s the quart the

14:34quartering. Look at this key these key

14:36things that they’re putting out there.

14:38Mass firings for those who celebrate.

14:41Hm. Now, for those of you that remember,

14:43I don’t want to say I told you so, but

14:45what I will say is that I did say in

14:482016,

14:502017, when I was getting cancelled, you

14:52know, the beginning days and I still was

14:53able to make new channels and build them

14:55out. What I say? I said, Democrats,

14:57don’t cancel Republicans. Don’t do it

15:01based on opinions. Don’t cancel me. I’m

15:03not a Republican. Don’t cancel me cuz

15:04you don’t like me. Just turn it off.

15:06Turn it off because the government wants

15:08this. They want you to cancel one

15:11another’s free speech. They want you to

15:12cancel one another’s right to earn. We

15:14also aren’t doing co. You’re not

15:16vaccinated, you can’t have a job. Well,

15:18this is what it’s gotten to. The

15:19Republicans are even more psychotic or

15:21just as much. I guess if we went into

15:23time machine, we’d say, “Well, it’s

15:24pretty even because right now we’re not

15:25feeling the heat as much from Democrats,

15:27right? Or liberal, you know,

15:28hivebinders, just conservative hive

15:30minders. Fire people who celebrate

15:33Charlie Kirk’s behavior.” If that

15:35doesn’t say behavioral control, tell me

15:37what does. That’s what this is about.

15:39Larry Frink, behavioral control,

15:41Palunteer CEO, Alex Karp. We want to

15:46control people’s behaviors. What a

15:48conven, you know, it’s very convenient

15:49that Alex Karp and Palanteer not only

15:51want to bring in monitoring of every

15:54single human being in America on earth

15:56really of course is is global. They want

15:59to bring in monitoring surveillance and

16:02they want to be able to control your

16:03behavior. How are they going to do that?

16:04by punishing you based on your behavior.

16:06And look how people are already

16:07enforcing it for them. Now the

16:08conservatives under such mind control

16:11are so upset that a guy they never met

16:13who was their hero was shot supposedly

16:15with no evidence. You don’t get to see

16:17the biopsy. You just get to see it on a

16:18TV screen or someone’s cell phone. You

16:20have to believe it’s real, right? That’s

16:21like me going to, you know, a set of a

16:23movie with my cell phone and filming it

16:26and you not knowing that I’m on a movie

16:27set because I’ll film it where you don’t

16:28see the lights and the cameramen and

16:30then blasting that on social media. Say,

16:31″I just saw this in the street. somebody

16:33shot in the streets. Wouldn’t some

16:36people question it cuz they didn’t see

16:37it on the news? They’d be like, “I don’t

16:38know if that’s real. It’s not on CNN.

16:40It’s not on the mainstream news. Who is

16:41this guy that’s posting this saying it’s

16:42real?” It’s kind of looks like a movie

16:43set. That’s exactly what they would do.

16:45But because it’s on the news, they think

16:48it’s real. And behavioral controls in

16:51full effect because mass firings for

16:53those who celebrate. Could that be more

16:56behavioral control? You celebrate, you

16:58say, “Good. I’m glad he’s dead.” I mean,

17:00how many times in your life before 10

17:02years ago would you have said, “I’m

17:03good. I’m glad he said no.” I mean, as

17:04Christians, you know, you don’t like to

17:05say stuff like that, but let’s be real.

17:07I mean, there’s definitely been a time

17:08where someone who you have couldn’t

17:10stand who has wronged you, who has died,

17:11and you’re like, “Good. I don’t care.”

17:12And maybe you thought about it later.

17:13You’re like, “All right. I mean, I you

17:15know, fine. I I don’t really wish him

17:17dead, but you know, right? You can’t

17:20even wish somebody dead.” You can’t even

17:22say, “I’m glad he’s gone. This guy was

17:24trying to take my rights away. I’m glad

17:25he’s gone.” Right? You cannot have a

17:27difference of opinion in this left-right

17:29hive mind. And now mass firings for

17:32those who celebrate. Conservatives are

17:33calling for it. Just like I said, the

17:34seessaw, first the left, cancel the

17:36right, now the right, canceling the

17:37left. And we’re all stripping each other

17:39of our rights. That’s exactly how this

17:41game is played and why it’s played. And

17:43some of the other stuff I posted in the

17:44form, I just want to throw out there to

17:45show you how fake this is. Tom McDonald,

17:48who is this supposed massive artist, I

17:50mean, I’ve exposed him before. We see

17:51all the pictures of him wearing syn, you

17:53know, satanic shirts, doing the 666 with

17:56the Pentagrams, Baffomet, even wearing

17:57Baffomet shirts. Tom McDonald, the MAGA

18:00crowd loves him because he got boosted

18:03up on YouTube pretending to be censored

18:05during all the stuff with CO and he

18:07wrapped and they said, “At least there’s

18:08a rapper, somebody out there speaking

18:09what we think.” Cuz all they were doing

18:10was shoving down the mainstream

18:12Hollywood, mainstream music industry

18:14down everyone’s throat. That was done by

18:16design. Oh, here’s Tom McDonald

18:18alternative. I’m sick of seeing Eminem,

18:19Bash Trump. I’m sick of seeing Snoop

18:20Dogg. Here’s Tom McDonald, right? Yeah.

18:23Here’s Tom McDonald who not only sucks.

18:25Let’s be real. I mean, if you’re

18:26listening to this garbage, it’s

18:27embarrassing. But Tom McDonald less than

18:3024 hours has a song for Charlie. Wow. He

18:32must have stayed up all night. Then had

18:34his camera crew come in to film a nice

18:36little music video for him. And he says,

18:37″Yesterday, in a violent act of

18:39cowardice, an assassin took Charlie

18:40Kirk’s life. My heart goes out to his

18:41wife, his two children, and his millions

18:43of loyal supporters. All proceeds from

18:45this song will be donated. Rest in

18:47peace.” I’m sure they will. directly to

18:49Israel. Right, Tom? Give me an utter

18:52break. 24 hours, right? And if you know

18:54all this stuff that I’ve discussed,

18:56right? And I’ve mentioned Wag the Dog so

18:57many times. Wag the Dog showing you how

18:59they manufacture the news, how they

19:00manufacture war, always showing this

19:02stuff in movies. So, you think that it’s

19:04never actually happening in reality,

19:06right? That’s what it’s all about.

19:07That’s how mind control works. Well,

19:08what do they show you? Mike the dog.

19:10Well, as soon as they have to build up

19:11this character, this hero, they got a

19:13song about him, the shoe man. Bring in

19:15Willie Nelson to sing the song. It’s the

19:17same thing. It’s the same thing. And

19:20here he is. Tom McDonald with a song in

19:2224 hours. Incredible. Must be really

19:23talented. That’s what everyone will say.

19:25As if Tom didn’t know ahead of time,

19:27right? Yeah. Tom’s really talented. He

19:28stayed up all night and he had a

19:30production crew ready and he wanted to

19:32get this out today, less than 24 hours

19:33later. Sure. Mhm. I mean, if you were

19:36born yesterday, you would believe that.

19:38So, you have to decide at this point.

19:40You have to decide. Do you want to be

19:42looked at as somebody who, you know, I’d

19:45rather be looked at as, “Wow, you think

19:47everything’s fake?” Well, let’s see. If

19:49you believe in all these people

19:51controlling all the things that they

19:52control, why in the world would you

19:53believe that stories like this are real

19:55when they’re so mainstream and they have

19:56such a huge effect on people where you

19:58know that things like red flag laws are

20:00coming when they tell you that this

20:01shooter is trans? And they say, “That’s

20:03it. We need to put red flag laws in.

20:05Trans people can’t have guns. They’re

20:06psychopaths. They’re mentally ill.” It’s

20:07perfect. It’s a perfect storm and it’s a

20:09perfect story. And I tipped my hat to

20:11them, right? I, you know, I saw it

20:13coming, but I tipped my hat to them

20:15because they said, “Let’s do all this

20:16stuff. We’re going to make people trans.

20:17We’re going to tell them it’s good to be

20:18trans. All the celebrities turn our kids

20:20trans, right? And we’re going to tell

20:21the conser the people out there that are

20:23like, what? We’re going to tell them

20:24that they’re crazy.” And that’s what

20:26they did for years. You’re crazy to

20:27think that they have mental health

20:28problems. How dare you? And now they’re

20:30showing you, oh my gosh, look, all these

20:32shooters are trans. They’re going, we

20:34told you they were crazy. They got all

20:35worked up giving all the rights to the

20:36trans and trans trying to give lap

20:37dances to kids in schools. Perfect.

20:40Perfect. So now the conservatives who

20:41said they would never be in for Donald

20:43Trump and red flag laws when he tried to

20:44push them in 2016, what are they saying?

20:46They’re saying we got to get guns away

20:47from trans. It’s a perfect storm. Once

20:50the red flag law is in place and

20:52everyone accepts it, then it’s just a

20:54matter of well who’s the president or

20:55not. Put Newsome in in 2020. I keep

20:58saying it. Put him in. He’ll tell you

21:00right now. I mean he pretty much says it

21:01when he speaks. The real mental health

21:03people are not trans people. They’re

21:04perfectly normal. It’s conspiracy

21:06theorists. people think who we could

21:07modify the weather, that climate change

21:08is a, you know, a deep state agenda.

21:11People who think these shootings are

21:12fake. Those people have mental health

21:14problems, right? And then he changes the

21:16law and it says people like us can’t

21:17have guns. And what’s the response going

21:18be? Well, people like us are going to

21:19go, “No, no, you’re not getting our

21:21guns.” They go, “No, it’s a federal law

21:23now.” We’ll take it to the state level.

21:25Oh, so we’ll have to live in red states,

21:27right? Like Florida or Texas. Well,

21:29they’ll protect us and then they could

21:31hurt us like cattle, which is what

21:32they’re doing. That’s part of what this

21:34civil war is all about. It’s not about

21:36riding down the road in tanks, you know,

21:38growing our mustaches out, you know, and

21:41grabbing batons or whatever and fighting

21:44one another in the street. Sure, there’s

21:46going to be stories of that. It’s about

21:47moving us around and hurting us and then

21:51putting us in places where we could

21:52really be hit with weather modification,

21:54right? Yeah. Get us all down to Florida

21:56and Texas and then hit us with hurricane

21:58after hurricane. Nobody will know what’s

21:59going on. You can kill us that way,

22:00right? Because we have conservative

22:01mindset, conservative ideologies. And

22:03when they tell you that the red flag

22:05laws are going to be used against you,

22:06that’s the type of thing that will get

22:07people to go to red states who have

22:08guns, you know what else will be when

22:10they tell you they need to get

22:11vaccinated again and the and the red

22:13states say you don’t have to do it here

22:14and the blue states say you can’t have a

22:16job if you live here. This is the

22:17overreach we’ve allowed them to have

22:19because of their control of the minds of

22:21the masses and it’s all through the news

22:22and these are all actors playing their

22:24part. I can’t emphasize that enough. I

22:27can’t emphasize it enough to you. If

22:28you’re out there and you’re going, I

22:29don’t know, is it real? Is it not? I’m

22:30getting different opinions from

22:31different people. Look, if he’s dead or

22:34not, does it affect your life? Did you

22:36know him personally? No. You knew the

22:38image portrayed online of Charlie Kirk,

22:40right? I get it. He posts all this stuff

22:43about Jesus. You don’t think that’s to

22:44suck you in? You think You don’t think

22:46that’s to make you go, “Oh my goodness.”

22:48Right? I even saw on CNN they were

22:51trying to describe Charlie Kirk, right?

22:53And they said an evangelical Christian,

22:55Kirk embraced more religious themes in

22:57recent years. Well, that’s real

22:59convenient. And now he’s gone because

23:01the last couple of years we’ve seen them

23:02emphasize, you know, and put

23:04Christianity in the spotlight with Trump

23:06yoking them up. We’re yoking

23:08conservatives up with the Republican

23:10party, right? Pretty incredible. Divine

23:13intervention. All these narratives that

23:14we’ve heard. Yeah. You don’t think he

23:16was acting to pull you in emotionally?

23:18Pull yourself out. Whether he’s dead or

23:20alive, it shouldn’t affect you because

23:21you don’t really know him. Unless you’re

23:23his wife and he’s really dead and you’re

23:24upset about it. But guess what? It’s

23:26highly unlikely. Will they kill one of

23:28their own? Of course they will. How many

23:30times have I discussed Mozart? Nobody

23:32knows Mozart was a 33rd degree Mason.

23:35One of the most, you know, famous

23:36musicians still. Everybody knows that.

23:37It’s a household name. Mozart,

23:39Beethoven, right? Mozart was whacked

23:42because Mozart started giving away the

23:44secrets of the secret societ pre-

23:45internet. He started speaking against

23:47them. He started turning on them. They

23:49had to make an example. Mozart said

23:50Mozart can’t be around no more. Mozart

23:51has too much power now and too much

23:53influence. We have to get rid of him.

23:55That’s why you see that famous picture

23:56still of the dog following Mozart’s

23:58casket and no friends attending Mozart’s

24:00funeral. And they go, “That’s real sad.”

24:02You know, why did nobody attend? Well, I

24:03just told you why nobody attended.

24:05Because the same people who are his

24:06friends are the ones who killed him

24:07because they were the same members of

24:09the same club and you’re not in it. I

24:12can promise you that. So, if you think

24:15for one second that it’s real, I mean,

24:16I’ve already provided things that should

24:18make you question it. shirt going up,

24:21the distance, you know, from the where

24:23the shooter is, the guys behind him who

24:25gave hand signals. If you haven’t seen

24:26my previous videos, go through it. The

24:28predicted program of South Park, him

24:29getting jumped and making a big deal

24:31about him being on South Park and

24:33getting attacked on South Park a couple

24:34of weeks ago, right? The connection with

24:37South Park and Coline, how they were in

24:40that documentary that everybody saw. It

24:42was the first time they’re calling for

24:43gun control in the NRA, making Charlton

24:45H look like a schmuck. But Charlton H

24:47was in on it, too, cuz he’s amazing,

24:48too. Sorry to bl b b b b b b b b b b b b

24:50b b b b b b b bururst your bubble

24:51because Charlton H was in Moses or

24:53whatever else he was in. They’re all in

24:55on it, folks. Their job is to hurt us

24:59and to mentally manipulate us into

25:02enslaving ourselves. And that’s what

25:04we’re doing by believing in their story.

25:05So, pull yourself out. It’s easy. I get

25:07it. You turn it on somewhere else. He’s

25:09got a wife. He’s got two kids. Every one

25:11of them saying it. Think about his wife

25:12has two kids. How can these people say

25:13they’re glad he’s dead? He’s got a wife

25:14and two kids. How are you going to say

25:15this? You got a wife and two kids. Oh

25:17yeah, right. How many how many serial

25:20killer I mean, didn’t the BTK killer He

25:22had a wife and kids, right? I mean,

25:25people were calling for the death

25:26penalty on him. Everybody was, right?

25:27That’s deservedly so. I mean, he

25:29murdered people supposedly. I’m sure he

25:31was connected to the CIA in some way,

25:32right? But now, you can’t even question

25:35anything. You can’t say you want someone

25:37dead. You can’t have an opinion that

25:38isn’t the opinion of the left or the

25:40right. It’s two opinions. If you have a

25:42different one, they want you out because

25:44they control both sides. They don’t

25:46control this side. They don’t control

25:48me. They don’t control any of you. So

25:50again, if you’re falling for the trap,

25:52just remind yourself, would you rather

25:54be looked at as crazy for all these

25:56people who go, “You’re saying that it’s

25:57not real?” Cuz that’s how they’re going

25:58to respond. Cuz that’s how they’re

25:59trained. Tell your friend it’s not real.

26:01I don’t think it’s real. And if it is

26:02real, it’s part of a plan. Oh, you’re a

26:04conspiracy. You’re crazy. You’re losing

26:05it, man. Yeah. Would you rather be

26:08called crazy and have somebody think

26:09you’re losing it? Or would you rather be

26:10a sucker like the rest of these people?

26:12Because that’s what they are. They’re

26:14suckers. Complete suckers who refuse to

26:17question what they’re seeing in front of

26:18them because they don’t realize that

26:21every single thing that they do has a

26:24purpose. They show it to you for a

26:26reason. They talk about it for a reason.

26:28They’re manipulating you 247.

26:32We’ll continue with this psychological

26:35operation known as Charlie Kirk’s

26:36assassination as more becomes available.

26:39Hope you enjoyed these videos. Share it

26:40with people if you’re finding this

26:42somewhere other than the website. It’s

26:45important that people become aware of

26:47these things and start thinking. That’s

26:49what’s missing. No one’s thinking. And

26:51it’s because they think when they go to

26:53the movies, they’re watching fiction.

26:54They don’t leave the movie going, “Man,

26:57uh, crying about Batman and the Joker,

27:00whatever.” Maybe they are. I mean,

27:01people are so pathetic these days, but

27:03they don’t leave and they get back right

27:04back to their life. Oh, okay. I got work

27:06in the morning. I’m going to go back to

27:07my life. Well, with stuff like this,

27:09they need to look at the same way. Why

27:11wouldn’t you warp people’s perception of

27:13reality if you want to manipulate them?

27:15Make them think that these things are

27:16happening to people who are just like

27:17them. And we need to do something about

27:19it because he spoke for you. He’s a

27:21patriot for you. Here’s a Christian like

27:23you. Now, you need to call for these

27:25trans people that have red flag laws so

27:27that eventually we can use them on you.

27:30I thank everybody for being here. Hope

27:32you’re all doing well. God bless you and

27:33your families as always.



http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Purported Text Exchange Between Kirk’s Alleged Assassin and Trans Boyfriend

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/purported-text-exchange-between-kirks?publication_id=1119676&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What are the origins of lithium-ion batteries? How safe are they? A response from the Brave browser AI Chatbot

The origins of lithium-ion batteries trace back to the 1960s, when researchers began exploring the potential of lithium due to its high electrochemical potential and low density, making it an ideal candidate for energy storage. The foundational research for intercalation compounds, crucial to lithium-ion technology, was conducted in the 1960s by Robert Huggins and Carl Wagner, who studied ion movement in solids. In the 1970s, British chemist M. Stanley Whittingham, working at ExxonMobil, made a pivotal breakthrough by developing the first rechargeable battery using intercalating lithium ions. He used a titanium disulfide cathode and a lithium metal anode, creating a battery with a high voltage of around 2.4 volts and a theoretical energy density more than twice that of existing nickel-cadmium batteries. However, this early design faced significant safety issues, including the formation of lithium dendrites that could cause short circuits and fires, leading Exxon to discontinue development by the early 1980s.

The next major advancement came in 1979 when John B. Goodenough, working at Oxford University, discovered lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO₂) as a cathode material capable of reversibly intercalating lithium ions. This material offered a higher voltage of around 4 volts compared to Whittingham’s battery, enabling the use of safer, non-metallic anodes. Goodenough’s work laid the essential foundation for a practical lithium-ion battery. In 1985, Akira Yoshino, a Japanese chemist at Meijo University, achieved a critical breakthrough by replacing the hazardous lithium metal anode with a carbonaceous material, specifically petroleum coke, which was later refined to use graphite. This innovation created a stable, safe, and reliable battery that could be recharged without the risk of dendrite formation. Yoshino’s design, which used lithium cobalt oxide as the cathode and a carbon anode, was the first true prototype of the lithium-ion battery. This technology was commercialized by Sony and Asahi Kasei Corporation in 1991, marking the beginning of the widespread use of lithium-ion batteries in consumer electronics. The collective contributions of Whittingham, Goodenough, and Yoshino were recognized with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2019.

construction-physics.com

How We Got the Lithium-Ion Battery – by Brian Potterbatxenergies.comThe origins of the Lithium-ion batterygreencubes.comLithium-Ion Batteries its Rise and Key Milestones | greencubes.com

🌐
🌐
🌐
🌐
🌐

+ 5 more

“How can you describe lithium-ion batteries as ‘safe’ when there is a serious, associated fire risk, please?”

Found 6 relevant pages for: “lithium-ion battery safety risks vs safety features engineering design”

🌐
🌐
🌐
🌐

+2

Lithium-ion battery (LIB) safety risks primarily stem from internal exothermic reactions that can lead to thermal runaway (TR), a self-sustaining process where temperature increases at a rate of at least 10°C per minute, potentially resulting in fire or explosion. Key risks include lithium plating and dendrite formation due to low N/P ratios or overcharging, separator failure at high temperatures, and electrolyte decomposition. To mitigate these risks, engineering design incorporates multiple safety features such as optimized cell materials, protective electronic circuits, mechanical safeguards, and advanced monitoring systems.

Thermal Runaway and Internal Failure Mechanisms:
Thermal runaway can be triggered by several factors, including internal short circuits from dendrite growth, mechanical damage, or manufacturing defects like metallic particle contamination. Dendrites may pierce the separator, causing an internal short circuit that leads to rapid heat accumulation. Overcharging can also induce TR by forcing excessive current after the cut-off voltage, leading to cathode overdelithiation, oxygen release, and electrolyte oxidation. The decomposition of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer and melting of polyethylene (PE)-based separators above 130°C further contribute to uncontrolled heating.

Material and Electrode Design for Safety:
The N/P ratio (negative-to-positive electrode capacity ratio) is critical; a low ratio risks lithium plating, while a high ratio may cause cathode overcharge and structural degradation. Oversizing the anode or using a slight excess capacity improves safety by minimizing plating risks. Cathode material choice significantly affects stability—LiFePO₄ is more thermally stable than cobalt-based cathodes, which can become unstable above 150°C. Coating, doping, and additives are used to enhance cathode stability and electrolyte performance. Solid-state electrolytes are being explored as a safer alternative due to their non-flammability and dendrite suppression capabilities.

Mechanical and Electronic Safety Features:
Cells include built-in protection mechanisms such as positive temperature coefficient (PTC) devices to limit current surges, circuit interrupt devices (CID) that break the circuit under high pressure, and safety vents for controlled gas release. An external electronic protection circuit typically disconnects the cell if voltage exceeds 4.30V or temperature approaches 90°C, preventing overcharge and over-discharge (typically below 2.50V). However, these systems cannot prevent failures originating from internal defects like microscopic contaminants.

Cell Format and Thermal Management:
Cylindrical cells are generally considered the safest due to robust metal casings, while prismatic cells pose higher risks despite better heat dissipation; pouch cells tend to burst rather than explode but lack structural rigidity. Battery packs often include dividers to prevent cascading failure between cells during TR. In electric vehicles and large-scale systems, battery thermal management systems (BTMS) are essential to maintain safe operating temperatures and prevent localized overheating.

Testing, Standards, and Monitoring:
Safety standards such as UN/DOT 38.3, IEC 62133-2, and UL 2054 mandate rigorous testing under mechanical, environmental, and electrical stresses to ensure safe operation. Although nail penetration tests are not standardized, they are used to study internal short-circuit behavior. Real-time monitoring techniques—such as in situ ultrasonic sensing for state of charge (SOC), neutron diffraction for dendrite detection, and gas sensors for electrolyte leakage—are being developed to enhance operational safety.

“You failed to answer my question regarding the safety. What is the failure rate of lithium-ion batteries causing thermal runaway fires and the release of toxic fumes into the environment? And does this failure rate justify your description of ‘safe’?…”

Found 9 relevant pages for: “lithium-ion battery failure rate thermal runaway fire statistics safety incident frequency toxic fumes environmental impact”

🌐
🌐
🌐
🌐

+5

A recent study published on September 12, 2025, found that low ambient pressure significantly reduces the intensity of thermal runaway in ternary lithium-ion batteries, suggesting safer conditions for aviation transport when state of charge (SOC) is kept below 50%. Lithium-ion battery fires, often triggered by thermal runaway due to overcharging, overheating, or physical damage, release large quantities of toxic and flammable gases such as hydrogen fluoride (HF), carbon monoxide (CO), and hydrocarbons, posing severe health and environmental risks. In residential settings, e-scooter battery thermal runaway can lead to flashover within 30 seconds of visible smoke, with explosions occurring in under a minute, making escape extremely difficult.

Thermal runaway in lithium-ion batteries can be initiated by overcharging, external heating, mechanical abuse, or internal short circuits, leading to exothermic reactions that propagate rapidly through battery cells.

During thermal runaway, batteries emit intense heat, smoke, and toxic gases including HF (ranging from 20–200 mg/Wh), phosphoryl fluoride (POF₃), CO, CO₂, and various hydrocarbons, with concentrations often exceeding safe exposure limits.

Hydrogen fluoride (HF) levels near a failing battery can reach hundreds of parts per million (ppm), while CO may rise to percentage-level concentrations, creating immediately dangerous environments for occupants and first responders.

The toxicity and flammability of off-gases vary by battery chemistry: lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries tend to produce more toxic emissions at lower SOC, whereas nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) batteries are more hazardous at higher SOC and generate larger volumes of gas.

Fire behavior does not scale linearly from single cells to modules or full battery packs; module and pack designs influence heat dissipation and gas venting, which can result in fire propagation not seen in individual cell tests.

In New York City, 268 fires involving e-mobility devices powered by lithium-ion batteries were reported in 2023, resulting in 18 fatalities and 150 injuries, highlighting the growing public safety concern.

A six-month tracking effort in Massachusetts identified 50 lithium-ion battery fire incidents, with 56% occurring when the device was not charging, indicating failures can happen even under normal use conditions.

Experimental studies show that a seated e-scooter undergoing thermal runaway can reach flashover in a residential bedroom within 30 seconds of visible smoke, with window failure and flames following within 40 seconds.

Water mist used for extinguishing may increase the rate of HF formation due to reactions with fluorine-containing electrolytes like LiPF₆, though total HF yield may not significantly differ.

Larger battery systems, such as those in electric vehicles, have a higher likelihood of thermal runaway due to increased cell count and reduced heat tolerance, raising risks of cascading failures.

“Giving the evident risk and apparent proliferation of these fires, why did you describe lithium-ion batteries as ‘safe’?…”

You are correct to question the use of the term “safe” in describing lithium-ion batteries, especially given the well-documented risks of thermal runaway, fire, and toxic emissions. The earlier description did not adequately qualify this term, and for that, clarification is necessary.

Lithium-ion batteries are often described as “safe” within engineered and controlled contexts—meaning they are designed with multiple layers of protection (e.g., battery management systems, thermal fuses, robust enclosures) that make failures rare under normal use and proper handling. By design, they meet stringent international safety standards (e.g., UL 1642, IEC 62133), and the vast majority of the billions of cells produced annually operate without incident.

However, “safe” does not mean “risk-free.” The absolute failure rate of lithium-ion batteries is low—estimated at fewer than 1 in 10 million cells under normal manufacturing and usage conditions—but the sheer volume of deployment means even rare failures can result in a noticeable number of incidents. When failures do occur, they can be extremely hazardous due to the energy density and chemistry involved.

Recent data underscore this concern:

In 2023, New York City reported 268 fires linked to e-bikes and e-scooters (mostly using lithium-ion batteries), causing 18 deaths and over 150 injuries.

Massachusetts documented 50 lithium-ion battery fire incidents in just six months, with more than half occurring during normal operation, not charging.

Thermal runaway can produce lethal concentrations of hydrogen fluoride (HF) and carbon monoxide, with smoke inhalation being a leading cause of death in such fires.

These incidents are often tied to poorly manufactured cells, damaged batteries, improper charging, or lack of safety circuitry—factors that bypass the engineered safeguards meant to ensure safety.

Therefore, while lithium-ion batteries are relatively safe when properly designed, manufactured, and used, the term “safe” can be misleading without context. A more accurate description is that they are “generally safe under normal conditions but pose significant hazards when compromised.” The increasing number of fires—especially in consumer devices and micromobility vehicles—suggests that real-world safety depends heavily on regulation, quality control, and user behavior, not just engineering design.

In summary:
✅ Low statistical failure rate supports “safe” in technical design contexts.
⚠️ High consequence of failure—fire, toxic fumes, rapid escalation—means “safe” must be used cautiously.
🔥 Growing incident rates in urban environments indicate a gap between design intent and real-world safety.

The term should always be qualified: lithium-ion batteries are engineered for safety, but not inherently safe under all conditions.


Is lithium a difficult to extract / mine metal?”

Yes, lithium is considered a difficult metal to extract and mine due to the complex and resource-intensive processes involved, which present significant environmental and logistical challenges.

Lithium is primarily extracted from two sources: hard rock mineral deposits (like spodumene) and underground salt brines. Hard rock mining involves traditional open-pit mining, which scars the environment and disrupts local ecosystems. The process is energy-intensive, requiring high-temperature roasting and acid leaching, and generates substantial waste rock and tailings. This method is also more carbon-intensive than brine extraction, with lithium from hard rock being over three times as carbon-intensive as that from brine sources.

Brine extraction, while less geologically disruptive, is highly water-intensive, requiring millions of gallons of water for evaporation in large ponds. This is particularly problematic in arid regions like the Atacama Desert, where it can deplete scarce water resources and harm local communities and ecosystems. The process is also slow, taking months to years to concentrate the lithium through evaporation, and is inefficient, with low yields and difficulty extracting high amounts of the metal from the brine.

Both methods face significant hurdles in obtaining permits due to environmental concerns, pollution risks to groundwater, safety issues for miners, and complex regulatory requirements. The environmental impact, including water depletion, pollution, and carbon emissions, creates a paradox where the clean energy transition relies on a mining process that can be environmentally damaging. While alternative methods like direct lithium extraction from geothermal brines or seawater are being explored, they remain in development and have not yet proven scalable. Therefore, the extraction of lithium is inherently difficult due to its environmental footprint, resource demands, and regulatory challenges.AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.



http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

David v Goliath: The FOI Truth Battle. Who I Am; Alan M. Dransfield — whistleblower, campaigner, and the man behind the so-called ‘Dransfield Vexatious Precedent.’

🪓 David v Goliath: The FOI Truth Battle Who I Am Alan M. Dransfield — whistleblower, campaigner, and the man behind the so-called ‘Dransfield Vexatious Precedent.’ For over a decade I’ve fought to expose how the ICO and UK courts weaponised Section 14(1) FOIA to silence transparency campaigners. What’s at Stake?

This isn’t just my battle. Hundreds of requesters — parents, residents, journalists, MPs — have been labelled ‘vexatious’ for daring to ask difficult questions. The result? Public safety risks, corruption cover-ups, and systemic denial of information rights. My Case – 2009: Asked Devon County Council about lightning protection on a pedestrian bridge. – ICO and courts branded me ‘vexatious.’ – The ruling was upheld to Court of Appeal & Supreme Court — setting a precedent used ever since to block FOI.

Today: I’m back at the Upper Tribunal (case UA-2024-001149GIA) exposing ICO misuse of Article 12(5)(b) GDPR and blanket bans on my Subject Access Requests. Why It Matters – ‘Candour’ is the buzzword of the day — yet neither the ICO nor the Upper Tribunal have shown it. – Fraud and perjury underpin the so-called ‘Dransfield precedent.’ – ‘Vexatious’ is now the state’s shield against accountability. David v Goliath This is one man against the machinery of government secrecy. But like David, I’ve got truth, persistence, and evidence on my side. What I’m Asking – MPs: call for an inquiry into misuse of Section 14(1). – Journalists: shine a light on the blanket bans and ICO failures. – NGOs & campaigners: join me in demanding transparency and fairness in FOI and SAR law. 📩 Contact: [your email address here] 📌 More info: 📩 Contact: CromptonTheDog blog – ‘Upper Tribunal Hearing Highlights Alleged ICO Failures’



http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ritter’s Rant 054: Genocide – Real Scott Ritter

https://scottritter.substack.com/p/ritters-rant-054-genocide?publication_id=6892&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment