https://www.disclose.tv/id/i36sjtbfel/

Could this be related to Starmer’s riciculous, current plans to send UK troops to Ukraine and is an attempt to prepare for body bags being returned to the UK from Ukraine? OR … in the event that Russia bombs UK cities / military bases, to be in a position to deal with the mass deaths caused?

https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/6bc9c974-d864-4f8f-9d02-024c03ea6d49

UK Mass Fatality 700 Deaths – an AI chatbot response:

The United Kingdom last experienced a mass fatality incident involving up to 700 deaths on July 7, 2005, during the 7/7 London bombings. On that day, 52 people were killed and more than 700 were wounded when four suicide bombers attacked the London transit system during the morning rush hour. This attack remains the deadliest on the British capital since World War II. The 20th anniversary of the event was commemorated on July 7, 2025.

nbcnews.com

King Charles leads 20th-anniversary commemoration of 7/7 London bombingsdata.who.intCOVID-19 deaths | WHO COVID-19 dashboarden.wikipedia.orgList of disasters in Great Britain and Ireland by death toll – Wikipedia

+ 1 more

Please revise for “up to 700 deaths”, as stated

There has not been a single mass fatality incident in the United Kingdom resulting in up to 700 deaths (i.e., 700 or more) in recent history. The deadliest such event in modern times was the 7 July 2005 London bombings, which resulted in 52 fatalities. While over 700 people were injured, the death toll was significantly lower than 700.

The last incident in the UK involving close to or exceeding 700 deaths was during World War II, particularly during the Blitz (1940–1941), when air raids on cities like London, Coventry, and Liverpool occasionally caused hundreds of deaths in a single night. However, no single incident in the post-war period has reached 700 fatalities.

Therefore, the UK has not experienced a mass fatality event with up to 700 deaths in peacetime.

http://paulcardin.substack.com

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=799359186096907&surface_type=vod&referral_source=vod_deeplink_unit

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

https://scottritter.substack.com/p/ritters-rant-043-patience?publication_id=6892&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/max-blumenthal-israels-biometric?publication_id=474765&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

https://beeley.substack.com/p/beyond-ukraine-alaska-summit-of-shadows?publication_id=716517&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

https://youtube.com/watch?v=_BuWzKzCdDU&si=kscobh-3CC0UNPJ0

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Regeneration Director Marcus Shaw – the one who lied through his teeth about old Birkenhead Market being riddled with asbestos – left his post a couple of months ago. The obedient, council lapdogs at the Liverpool Echo will have been fully informed about his silent departure, but SAID NOTHING inside their pisspoor pages.

I assume someone senior at the council has finally given them the go ahead to spill the beans.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/wirrals-top-regeneration-boss-leaves-32309109

On the sly, Basnett and friends were making moves to replace senior people as part of the senior employment / appointments committee last week.

SEE HERE

Councillor Paula Basnett – Leader AND CEO of Wirral Chamber – FOI request to Wirral Council

David Green – the Director’s not for returning…?

http://paulcardin.substack.com

https://scottritter.substack.com/p/for-the-children-of-the-donbas?publication_id=6892&play_audio=true&utm_content=watch_now_button&triedRedirect=true

From Alan M. Dransfield

Boston, Lincolnshire – August 2025

Dear Mr Edwards,

I am writing this letter in the open, because private correspondence with your office has been stonewalled, delayed, or dismissed for over a decade. The public deserves to see how the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has become a shield for misconduct rather than a guardian of transparency.

The Issues at Stake

1. The Dransfield PrecedentMy own case (Dransfield v ICO, 2012–2015) has been twisted into a blanket excuse for public authorities to deny Freedom of Information requests as “vexatious.” This precedent has silenced whistleblowers, denied justice to families, and concealed wrongdoing across government.
2. Lifetime BansYour office has imposed a lifetime email ban on me, and by extension, a blanket ban on my FOI and EIR rights. This is not just maladministration — it is a denial of my statutory rights.
3. Perjury and MisconductThree senior ICO officials — Alex Goantis, Adam Sowerbutts, and Gerrard Tracey — played central roles in my case. All are now no longer employed by the ICO. In particular, Mr Tracey’s witness statement amounted to fiction at best, and gross perjury at worst. Yet no accountability has followed.
4. Misuse of Section 50(2)(c) FOIA and Article 12(5)(b) GDPRThese provisions have been manipulated into blanket bans to block me, and others, from accessing justice or even basic responses to Subject Access Requests.

Why This Matters

The ICO’s purpose is to uphold transparency and protect citizens’ rights. Instead, under your watch, it has become complicit in a systemic cover-up — from child sex exploitation FOIs, to environmental safety concerns, to the silencing of political scandal.

Transparency, accountability, and security must be seen to be working. If they are not seen to be working, then in all probability they are not working. And right now, they are not working in your office, they are not working in Mr Richard Bailey’s office, and they did not work in the offices of your two predecessors.

Notwithstanding the veracity of my allegations, the gravity of my assertions behooves your office to call for an independent inquiry. Without it, the credibility of the ICO will remain compromised and public trust will collapse further.

My Demands

1. A public acknowledgment that the Dransfield precedent has been misapplied.
2. An end to the unlawful use of lifetime bans on FOIA and EIR requesters.
3. A commitment to investigate perjury and misconduct by former ICO staff.
4. Publication of statistics showing how often the ICO has endorsed Section 14 “vexatious” refusals since 2015.

Closing

This is not about me alone. It is about the hundreds of ordinary citizens whose voices have been silenced because your office has weaponised the word “vexatious.”

The ICO is supposed to defend our rights — not strip them away. It is time for you, Mr Edwards, to answer publicly.

Yours sincerely,

Alan M. Dransfield

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com