Eugene Island Output Fluctuations
The oilfield Eugene Island Block 330’s output did indeed experience a decline from 15,000 barrels per day to 4,000 barrels per day before surging to 13,000 barrels per day. According to historical data, after peaking at about 15,000 barrels per day following its 1973 discovery, production slowed to about 4,000 barrels per day by 1989. Then, suddenly, the field’s fortunes reversed, and it began producing 13,000 barrels per day.
The explanation for this unexpected surge remains a subject of debate. Some scientists suggest that the oil reservoir at Eugene Island may be refilling itself from a continuous source miles below the Earth’s surface. This theory is supported by the discovery that the geological age of the oil produced later is different from that recovered 10 years earlier, indicating a possible deep-seated oil source.
However, most petroleum scientists believe that the depletion profile is adequately explained by replenishment from deeper reservoirs of normal biologically derived petroleum. The source of additional oil was analyzed as migrating through faults from deeper and older formations below the probable Jurassic and Early Cretaceous age. The oil contains biomarkers closely related to other very old oils which were long trapped in deep formations.
Despite these explanations, the phenomenon remains an anomaly and has sparked interest in the possibility of abiotic oil, although the evidence is not conclusive.
en.wikipedia.org
Eugene Island block 330 oil field – Wikipediascience-frontiers.comThe mystery of eugene island 330en.wikipedia.orgDeepwater Horizon oil spill – Wikipedia
+ 2 more
“Abiotic oil appears to be the most likely scenario here, wouldn’t you agree?“
Found 6 relevant pages for: “Eugene Island oilfield abiotic oil theory evidence scientific consensus”
+2
The Eugene Island oilfield has been cited in discussions surrounding the abiotic oil theory, with some proponents suggesting it as evidence of deep, non-biogenic hydrocarbon sources refilling the reservoir. Production data from Eugene Island showed fluctuations, peaking at 30,000 barrels per day in 1996 before declining steadily thereafter. Some have interpreted this as evidence of a deep source slowly replenishing the reservoir. However, geologists working on the field have not attributed this refilling to a primordial or abiotic origin of the oil.
Scientific consensus remains firmly in favor of a biogenic origin for most of Earth’s petroleum deposits. While abiogenic hydrocarbons have been identified in mantle-derived rocks and in specific geological settings such as meteor impact craters and volcanic rocks, these occurrences are generally of low concentration and not commercially significant. The abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis, which posits that hydrocarbons originate from deep carbon deposits rather than fossilized organic matter, has not produced conclusive evidence for commercially viable deposits of abiotic oil.
Despite some claims, such as those by Alexander Kitchka suggesting that 60% of oil may be abiotic in origin, the mainstream geological community remains skeptical. Commercial oil deposits are typically explained through well-established biotic migration mechanisms from sedimentary source rocks, even in cases where oil is found in non-sedimentary reservoirs such as granites or metamorphic rocks.
Thus, while the Eugene Island oilfield has been used as a point of discussion in abiogenic oil debates, it does not represent a definitive case supporting the theory, and the broader scientific community continues to favor biogenic explanations for petroleum formation.AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin
Amazon link
Wirral In It Together 