———- Forwarded message ———From: <postmaster@indigoffice.onmicrosoft.com>Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 at 08:55Subject: Undeliverable: Fwd: IR F24-344 Internal Review responseTo: <alanmdransfield Your message to casework@ico.org.uk couldn’t be delivered.
A custom mail flow rule created by an admin at indigoffice.onmicrosoft.com has blocked your message.Please check Plîs gwiriwch https://ico.org.uk/global/contact-us/alanmdransfield Office 365 ico.org.ukSender Action RequiredBlocked by mail flow ruleHow to Fix It
An email admin at indigoffice.onmicrosoft.com has created a custom mail flow rule that blocks messages that meet certain conditions, and it appears that your message has met one or more of those conditions.
Check the text above for a custom message from the email admin that may help explain why your message was blocked and how you might be able to fix it. For example, removing prohibited words from the message or sending the message from a different email account may be sufficient to deliver your message.If you’ve tried and you’re still not able to fix the problem, consider contacting the email admin at indigoffice.onmicrosoft.com to discuss what to do. While they’re unlikely to remove or relax the rule, if you have a legitimate need to deliver your message they may offer guidance for how to do so.
This error occurs because an email admin at indigoffice.onmicrosoft.com has created a custom mail flow rule that has blocked the sender’s message.
In some cases, the sender can change the message so it no longer violates the rule. However, depending on the rule’s conditions, it’s possible that the only way to deliver the message is to change the rule itself, and only an email admin at indigoffice.onmicrosoft.com can do that. Although it’s possible the rule is unintentionally flawed or it’s stricter than the admin intended, it may be working exactly as they want it to.
Original Message DetailsCreated Date: 8/15/2024 7:55:12 AMSender Address: alanmdransfield Recipient Address: casework@ico.org.ukSubject: Fwd: IR F24-344 Internal Review responseError DetailsError: 550 5.7.1 TRANSPORT.RULES.RejectMessage; the message was rejected by organization policyMessage rejected by: LO6P265MB6396.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COMNotification DetailsSent by: LO6P265MB6396.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COMMessage HopsHOP TIME (UTC) FROM TO WITH RELAY TIME1 8/15/20247:55:25 AM mail-lf1-f49.google.com SMTP 13 sec2 8/15/20247:55:25 AM mail-lf1-f49.google.com AM3PEPF0000A79B.mail.protection.outlook.com Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) *3 8/15/20247:55:25 AM AM3PEPF0000A79B.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com AM4PR0302CA0033.outlook.office365.com Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) *4 8/15/20247:55:25 AM AM4PR0302CA0033.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com LO6P265MB6396.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) *Original Message HeadersReceived: from AM4PR0302CA0033.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:205:2::46) by LO6P265MB6396.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:2df::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7875.16; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:55:25 +0000Received: from AM3PEPF0000A79B.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:205:2:cafe::a) by AM4PR0302CA0033.outlook.office365.com (2603:10a6:205:2::46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7849.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:55:25 +0000Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.49) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.49 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.49; helo=mail-lf1-f49.google.com; pr=CReceived: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (209.85.167.49) by AM3PEPF0000A79B.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.16.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7849.8 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:55:25 +0000Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52f04b4abdcso802064e87.2; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 00:55:25 -0700 (PDT)DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1723708524; x=1724313324; darn=ico.org.uk; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XVqRZD7Mjmn5RAIWk0MBz8NfFM3N5APGEFapf6jeXVY=; b=cKYuhBylsl6uSZP5bzr9QgJtWFPLKUkdnMTKvPF8QcR6Cfo4YZ3/UcJT9jhByrAR++ ncmV3zeVT+XLiy2Z/2Z0IfrzvuC8d5R0wazzE5pPSL+0AtBQCRZCCMuOPATdfkK8vm7K DUfsir75bsyW3ePPdQN2GkRq/xCW+vRD6aeW+lbxXK+0JlAaOwxgYSMZg6PI/LP7zjk2 y5kI3v21rehZ7DakwLyrcX8vYnDGEaXUulyXLvS5mFcPz+TW80h7mY0T27oMHa0XEPuw lGM2FVpuHH3hBLjO9A+9f1bbWqndkrM/6YyhecOKC2Unzco+0tarxGoJQiUuAbJKyoNj PCCg==X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723708524; x=1724313324; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XVqRZD7Mjmn5RAIWk0MBz8NfFM3N5APGEFapf6jeXVY=; b=BUQG1pkKXYqdA5kHN3dTchKxwQJfkmW9o1X8X859+iUpdQJ17XTNh5/ft+R81AC6Sf Btuk7+v6lePocTB7ZI+WwHb1ML8YVq85WyKHrhryU1bieTBPObB7qnCDTpy0kEwaRVyO b465OqxS7VMPNSJKrgWpxF0+8qqhxNnM/re63gycS2D9Hn/433UlHo/ygAVxeKgKZagW mgE9a2LtMho1Y9xqdWi/Ny1aR5cc78dN1GKietWdmHdcKQb/jiB8h/cmLE7QLl4ndV8j DG10X0TEAJmvavFEurcjz6HfHUYMYZheeajwBXy7Z5khGkQF6HSHnBdchYcgWXSemWfO o+DA==X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXo8s5NIgQxgvGx2GNWr/NsOZGFc4E9BjUZirOfFNnG35oP6lugUZwoosmbVW2mZLZAsdOaAWwZfJe3/IaCEnRrwz6CWsNImqD8i7xoMVWsdlQelPGF403Xy6cQS7bLXkWGX-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzB6ljn2FmQokVj0Jii8TZFHmCH3C0bjDr6IJodgz4b6O5ebMGb 7LcraDY3zGnFsa/PQ5fPvVGzZazx9G4MhY0iJDnxC+I5vcLJvlU8/Z2FlvbD9ZPZNErpcSIMf23 gds0rsiMHSGDQh9YYE/RnPRSb0Nc8jg==X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHAa2HVgwKWPPKnbMQRmgjNWUkw3RJvz4a7dRb2OA4GuPTKLmJL3iMvneOSPcviSpn2Kmvu2yWLh4A5r3SmfzU=X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:230a:b0:52c:e09c:b747 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-532eda82f75mr2723936e87.27.1723708523815; Thu, 15 Aug 2024 00:55:23 -0700 (PDT)MIME-Version: 1.0References: <CAEEzusU1GOEE2-X-w=9X8Ntc9He5=ZgQDmTZmBqRtj63p6VzFQ@mail.gmail.com> <LO4P123MB67289E5DF5DAAF9EABBD24F8BDDC2@LO4P123MB6728.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CWXP123MB483750D78FD46F846D692C62D7A52@CWXP123MB4837.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <LO3P123MB3067044120BE491A46037740A6A62@LO3P123MB3067.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CWXP123MB4837CC8F22891472A91C578BD7A22@CWXP123MB4837.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <LO0P123MB6553DEC359EB303D82B4DDEDBAA22@LO0P123MB6553.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CWXP123MB4837034C35AC3F418741296FD7A32@CWXP123MB4837.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAEEzusUWOcSit0zDY9tF+Hx_OuHZRL1pE-oBf+5PruHdxhHZBQ@mail.gmail.com> <LO3P123MB3067B3E1159A5B3AB857A50EA6AD2@LO3P123MB3067.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <LO3P123MB30673E12CCC62F5028A429C5A6872@LO3P123MB3067.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAEEzusXLr2T3PsyxyARGvF5cZuKDPFr=fNJSwneZ9wqPk4OPTw@mail.gmail.com> <CACPo8EtdxngJWqMb+0F29_YOpkuifUPwPmE70kbiEfubrxW44Q@mail.gmail.com>In-Reply-To: <CACPo8EtdxngJWqMb+0F29_YOpkuifUPwPmE70kbiEfubrxW44Q@mail.gmail.com>From: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield>Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 08:55:12 +0100Message-ID: <CAEEzusUodBvS9o8yDg0PCHJuj0nvv+oJmbA4-6xiHdMN=dvwvQ@mail.gmail.com>Subject: Fwd: IR F24-344 Internal Review responseTo: “<casework@ico.org.uk>” <casework@ico.org.uk>, ICO Casework <icocasework@ico.org.uk>CC: richard.tice@reformparty.uk, Richard Bailey <Richard.Bailey@ico.org.uk>Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=”000000000000424a11061fb42a26″Return-Path: alanmdransfield@gmail.comX-EOPAttributedMessage: 0X-EOPTenantAttributedMessage: 50129323-8fab-4000-adc1-c4cfebfa21e6:0X-MS-PublicTrafficType: EmailX-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM3PEPF0000A79B:EE_|LO6P265MB6396:EE_X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: f94dab84-7e77-4485-374b-08dcbcff9f4bX-MS-Exchange-AtpMessageProperties: SA|SL———- Forwarded message ———-From: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield>To: “<casework@ico.org.uk>” <casework@ico.org.uk>, ICO Casework <icocasework@ico.org.uk>Cc: richard.tice@reformparty.uk, Richard Bailey <Richard.Bailey@ico.org.uk>Bcc: Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 08:55:12 +0100Subject: Fwd: IR F24-344 Internal Review responseExternal: This email originated outside the ICO.Dear SirsPlease find the response from the House of Commons who claim they have no 5 G facility. I now wish to elevate this to the ICO.With thanks Alan M Dransfield———- Forwarded message ———On Wed, 14 Aug 2024, 15:08 alan dransfield, <alanmdransfield> ———- Forwarded message ———From: FOI Commons <FOICOMMONS@parliament.uk>Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 13:21Subject: IR F24-344 Internal Review responseTo: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield>Dear Alan Dransfield, Internal Review Request for IR F24-344 Further to your request for an Internal Review, please find our response attached. If you are still dissatisfied, you can complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office whose details can be found here: https://ico.org.uk/. Yours sincerely, Abigail RichmondInformation Rights ManagerHouse of Commons Information Compliance ServiceHouse of Commons, Palace of Westminster, London SW1A 0AA For information about how the House of Commons uses your personal data please see our privacy notices: http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/data-protection From: FOI CommonsSent: 19 July 2024 15:09To: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield>Subject: IR F24-344 Internal Review request acknowledgement Dear Alan Dransfield, Freedom of Information Request F24-344 I am writing to acknowledge your two further emails, copied below, in which you ask for an Internal Review of our response to your request. We will endeavour to provide a response within 20 working days. However, it may be necessary to extend this deadline by another 20 working days, for example if the review is complicated and requires the assistance of multiple resources. If you have any questions in the meanwhile, please let me know. Yours sincerely, Abigail RichmondInformation Rights ManagerHouse of Commons Information Compliance ServiceHouse of Commons, Palace of Westminster, London SW1A 0AA For information about how the House of Commons uses your personal data please see our privacy notices: http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/data-protection From: alan dransfield alanmdransfield Sent: 19 July 2024 11:13To: FOI Commons FOICOMMONS@parliament.ukCc: Richard Bailey Richard.Bailey@ico.org.uk; richard.tice@reformparty.ukSubject: Re: F24-344 Response Dear SirYour response, at best,is codswallop and at worst, unlawful.You hold vicarious responsibility for the Danger of 5G at both the House of Commons and House of Lords. Alan M Dransfield From: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield>Sent: 17 July 2024 19:20To: FOI Commons <FOICOMMONS@parliament.uk>Subject: Fwd: F24-344 Response Please see the attached House if Commons Decision Notice.I now wish the HofCto review this decisionWith thanksAlan M Dransfield ———- Forwarded message ———From: FOI Commons <FOICOMMONS@parliament.uk>Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 18:10Subject: F24-344 ResponseTo: alanmdransfield <alanmdransfield> Dear Alan Dransfield, Freedom of Information Request F24-344 Thank you for your request for information as copied below. You asked to be provided with 5G system Safety Certificates for “all Westminster Premises”. We have interpreted “Westminster premises” in this instance to mean any safety certificates we hold relating to 5G systems on the parliamentary estate. This information is not held by the House of Commons. We do not hold any certificates of the nature specified, and this is because the parliamentary estate does not currently have any 5G coverage. You may, if dissatisfied with the handling of your request, complain to the House of Commons. Alternatively, if you are dissatisfied with the outcome of your request you may ask the House of Commons to conduct an internal review of any decision regarding your request. Complaints or requests for internal review should be addressed to: Information Compliance Team, Governance Office, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA or foicommons@parliament.uk. Please ensure that you specify the full reasons for your complaint or internal review along with any arguments or points that you wish to make. If you remain dissatisfied, you may appeal to the Information Commissioner at Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF, https://ico.org.uk/. Yours sincerely, Thomas SpencerInformation Rights OfficerHouse of Commons Information Compliance ServiceHouse of Commons, Palace of Westminster, London SW1A 0AA parliament.ukThe House of Commons welcomes feedback. If you have any compliments, complaints or comments about the service that you have received please complete the online feedback form For information about how the House of Commons uses your personal data please see our privacy notices: http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/data-protection From: alan dransfield <alanmdransfield>Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 12:18 PMTo: Speaker’s Office <speakersoffice@parliament.uk>; Speaker’s Committee <SPEAKERSCOMMITTEE@parliament.uk>Cc: WARMAN, Matt <matt.warman.mp@parliament.uk>; Richard Bailey <Richard.Bailey@ico.org.uk>; Richard Bailey <Richard.Bailey@ico.gsi.gov.uk>; GRC <grc@justice.gov.uk>Subject: Fraudulent 5G Safety Certificates DEar SirsThere is breaking news that 5G system have received Fraudulent Test Certificates.I would envisage he Westminster premises period will also have fraudulent 5G Certificate.To this end please provide me with FOIA copies of the Safety Certificates for all Westminster Premises.5g Systems.These Test Certificates will come under ICNIRP with thanks Alan M DransfieldUK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
More Info for Email AdminsStatus code: 550 5.7.1_ETR
Wirral Residents Association
JOIN US at: wirralinittogether@proton.me
Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin
Amazon link
Wirral In It Together 