Starmer has signed up to the UN’s agreement to raise taxes in the UK – The Expose

https://expose-news.com/2025/07/07/starmer-has-signed-up-to-the-uns-tax-agreement/

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two World Wars and Hitler: Who Was Responsible?

https://plagueonbothhouses.substack.com/p/two-world-wars-and-hitler-who-was?publication_id=1689665&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

7/7 Bombings – What Really Happened? – by The Fox Blog

https://foxyfox.substack.com/p/77-bombings-what-really-happened?publication_id=142468&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Rise Of Artificial Intelligence – by D. Marks

https://reportfromplanetearth.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-artificial-intelligence-d34?publication_id=1147069&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FBI and DOJ claim Jeffrey Epstein had no client list!

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/fbi-and-doj-claim-jeffrey-epstein-had-no-client-list?publication_id=806546&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

EP. 133 WAKE UP WITH SONIA POULTON & GUESTS: 7 JULY 2025

https://youtube.com/live/WzjyvHCKgCw?si=9ysOixjvJQYKWlDO

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Liverpool Parade Incident – Pighooey

https://pighooey.substack.com/p/the-liverpool-parade-incident?publication_id=2440675&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=b9xiw&utm_medium=email

Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I’ve just sent a very important email to all of my local Wirral Borough councillors and MPs. Subject: 5G installations are not insured, and there is a ticking time bomb beneath future personal injury claims

Paul Cardin <gorkys611@googlemail.com>18:50 (0 minutes ago)
to Angela, Allan, Elizabeth, alison.mcgovern.mp, Amanda, Max, Brian, Brenda, Colin, Janette, James, Stuart, Angie, Christopher, Judith, Graham, Ed, Ewan, Jeff, Steve, Harry, Phil, Andrew, Grahame, Helen, Andrew, Helen, (Councillor), Vicki, Ian, Kieran, Kaitlin, Louise, Tom, Lesley, Craig, Tony, Naomi, Pat, Jason, Paul, Sue, Cherry, Jean, Mike, Ruth, Simon, Mark, Mike, Stephen, Tony, Tony, Vida, Gillian, Jerry, Ann, Paula, Gary, Jo, justin.madders.mp@parliament.uk, Chris, P, Craig, George, Gail, Graeme, Jenny, Mary, Paul, Paul, news, newsdesk, tips

THIS MESSAGE IS ADDRESSED TO ALL WIRRAL COUNCILLORS AND MPs

Dear Wirral Councillors, et al.

I will great straight to the point here. Today, I find I have a sombre duty to advise you that you will be found personally and serially liable as and when the ticking time bomb beneath future ElectroMagnetic Frequency (EMF) adverse effects-related personal injury claims explodes.

As I’ve informed you repeatedly in the past, right across Wirral, it is TRUE that all of your approved 5G installations are not covered by any insurance. Because the companies who could be involved have refused.

Please don’t imagine for one second that you will one day be in a position to conceal yourself behind official committees or complicit senior officers or any other lame excuse for failed accountability.

Please click the following link to an important .pdf document which underlines why e.g. top insurance company Swiss RE will not be insuring the 5G installations that you people are currently approving on a whim, without correct scrutiny, and without a backward glance.

https://expose-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Swiss-Re-SONAR-2019-report.pdf

I am not abusing you, Councillor Stuart Kelly.

This is factual information, Councillor Andrew Gardner.

I am here to help you, and in order to assist you further, here is a useful excerpt containing all 5G-related topics held at the above link (my emphasis):

Off the leash – 5G mobile networks

5G – short for fifth generation – is the latest standard for cellular mobile communications. Providing ultrafast broadband connection with higher capacity and lower latency, 5G is not only heaven for your smartphone. It will enable wireless connectivity in real time for any device of the Internet of things (IoT), whether that be autonomous cars or sensor-steered factory. In doing so, it will allow decentralised, seamless interconnectivity between devices. To allow for a functional network coverage and increased capacity overall, more antennas will be needed, including acceptance of higher levels of electromagnetic radiation. In some jurisdictions, the rise of threshold values will require legal adaptation. Existing concerns regarding potential negative health effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) are only likely to increase. An uptick in liability claims could be a potential long-term consequence. Other concerns are focused on cyber exposures, which increase with the wider scope of 5G wireless attack surfaces. Traditionally IoT devices have poor security features. Moreover, hackers can also exploit 5G speed and volume, meaning that more data can be stolen much quicker. A large-scale breakthrough of autonomous cars and other IoT applications will mean that security features need to be enhanced at the same pace. Without, interruption and subversion of the 5G platform could trigger catastrophic, cumulative damage. With a change to more automation facilitated by new technology like 5G, we might see a further shift from motor to more general and product liability insurance. There are also worries about privacy issues (leading to increased litigation risks), security breaches and espionage. The focus is not only on hacking by third parties, but also potential breaches from built-in hard- or software “backdoors.” In addition, the market for 5G infrastructure is currently focussed on a couple of firms, and that raises the spectre of concentration risk. Potential impacts:  Cyber exposures are significantly increased with 5G, as attacks become faster and higher in volume. This increases the challenge of defence.  Growing concerns of the health implications of 5G may lead to political friction and delay of implementation, and to liability claims. The introductions of 3G and 4G faced similar challenges.  Information security and national sovereignty concerns might delay implementation of 5G further, increasing uncertainty for planning authorities, investors, tech companies and insurers.  Heated international dispute over 5G contractors and potential for espionage or sabotage could affect international cooperation, and impact financial markets negatively.  As the biological effects of EMF in general and 5G in particular are still being debated, potential claims for health impairments may come with a long latency.

5G mobile networks will enable wireless connectivity in real time – a prerequisite for broad use of autonomous cars.

Cyber risks

Cyber risk presents one of the largest opportunities for the re/insurance industry, while simultaneously presenting one of the largest challenges. The frequency and severity of risks resulting from cyber-attacks and their changing nature, are expected to grow significantly over the next years. The need for cyber resilience has become a main focus of attention among corporate clients and insurance companies, triggering insurance demand. The SONAR report has flagged the evolving aspects of technological change and uncertainty in a series of cyber risk themes over the past years. This includes a focus on vulnerabilities from the IoT (2015), the challenges from increased internet fragmentation (2016), accumulation risks from cloud solutions (2017) and lurking cyber risk from end-of-life software and hardware still in use (2018). In this yearʼs report, we focus on exposures from 5G mobile and where software enhancements are applied to existing legacy hardware, particularly in the case of large infrastructure facilities.

5G will enable wireless connectivity in real time for any device of the IoT, such as autonomous cars or sensor-steered factory. Current concerns regarding potential negative health effects from electromagnetic fields are likely to increase. Hackers can also exploit 5G speed and volume to acquire (or steal) more data faster. Major concerns are possible privacy and security breaches, and espionage.

Best regards, and – Councillor Stuart Kelly – in order to steady the ship, please invite our residents association to one of your planning committees – soonest – to help you properly represent the compelling public interest with regard to these important public safety matters,

Best regards,

Paul Cardin

Wirral Residents Association

www.wirralresidentsassociation.co.uk

http://paulcardin.substack.com


Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Did the oilfield Eugene Island’s output reduce from 15,000 barrels per day to 4,000 barrels per day and then surge to 13,000 barrels per day? What’s the explanation, if true?

Eugene Island Output Fluctuations

The oilfield Eugene Island Block 330’s output did indeed experience a decline from 15,000 barrels per day to 4,000 barrels per day before surging to 13,000 barrels per day. According to historical data, after peaking at about 15,000 barrels per day following its 1973 discovery, production slowed to about 4,000 barrels per day by 1989. Then, suddenly, the field’s fortunes reversed, and it began producing 13,000 barrels per day.

The explanation for this unexpected surge remains a subject of debate. Some scientists suggest that the oil reservoir at Eugene Island may be refilling itself from a continuous source miles below the Earth’s surface. This theory is supported by the discovery that the geological age of the oil produced later is different from that recovered 10 years earlier, indicating a possible deep-seated oil source.

However, most petroleum scientists believe that the depletion profile is adequately explained by replenishment from deeper reservoirs of normal biologically derived petroleum. The source of additional oil was analyzed as migrating through faults from deeper and older formations below the probable Jurassic and Early Cretaceous age. The oil contains biomarkers closely related to other very old oils which were long trapped in deep formations.

Despite these explanations, the phenomenon remains an anomaly and has sparked interest in the possibility of abiotic oil, although the evidence is not conclusive.

en.wikipedia.org

Eugene Island block 330 oil field – Wikipediascience-frontiers.comThe mystery of eugene island 330en.wikipedia.orgDeepwater Horizon oil spill – Wikipedia

🌐
🌐

+ 2 more

Abiotic oil appears to be the most likely scenario here, wouldn’t you agree?

Found 6 relevant pages for: “Eugene Island oilfield abiotic oil theory evidence scientific consensus”

🌐
🌐
🌐
🌐

+2

The Eugene Island oilfield has been cited in discussions surrounding the abiotic oil theory, with some proponents suggesting it as evidence of deep, non-biogenic hydrocarbon sources refilling the reservoir. Production data from Eugene Island showed fluctuations, peaking at 30,000 barrels per day in 1996 before declining steadily thereafter. Some have interpreted this as evidence of a deep source slowly replenishing the reservoir. However, geologists working on the field have not attributed this refilling to a primordial or abiotic origin of the oil.

Scientific consensus remains firmly in favor of a biogenic origin for most of Earth’s petroleum deposits. While abiogenic hydrocarbons have been identified in mantle-derived rocks and in specific geological settings such as meteor impact craters and volcanic rocks, these occurrences are generally of low concentration and not commercially significant. The abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis, which posits that hydrocarbons originate from deep carbon deposits rather than fossilized organic matter, has not produced conclusive evidence for commercially viable deposits of abiotic oil.

Despite some claims, such as those by Alexander Kitchka suggesting that 60% of oil may be abiotic in origin, the mainstream geological community remains skeptical. Commercial oil deposits are typically explained through well-established biotic migration mechanisms from sedimentary source rocks, even in cases where oil is found in non-sedimentary reservoirs such as granites or metamorphic rocks.

Thus, while the Eugene Island oilfield has been used as a point of discussion in abiogenic oil debates, it does not represent a definitive case supporting the theory, and the broader scientific community continues to favor biogenic explanations for petroleum formation.AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.


Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception, by Paul Cardin

Amazon link

http://paulcardin.substack.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Applied Behavioural Psychology – Part 4

https://dhughes.substack.com/p/2526c610-4a4b-4b5b-a43d-39caa136b1aa

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment