“Dear AI, tell me about the experiences of Sascha Riley, adopted son of pilot William Riley.”
Sascha Riley, born Manuel Sascha Barros in 1973, claims he was adopted at age four by William Kyle Riley, a Georgia-based pilot, in 1975. He alleges this adoption was not an act of rescue but the beginning of his entry into a child trafficking network linked to Jeffrey Epstein and others, including Donald Trump and Jim Jordan.
From ages nine to thirteen, Riley says he was repeatedly trafficked across multiple states—including Alabama and New York—subjected to sexual abuse, forced production of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), and witnessed extreme violence, including the alleged murder of other children. He claims Epstein’s clients, including high-profile figures, were involved in the abuse and that the material was sold as “snuff films.”
Riley served in the U.S. Army from 1991 to 1998 and reenlisted after 9/11, deploying to Iraq multiple times. He earned military honors and has publicly shared his DD-214 discharge documents, which are consistent with his service record.
A pivotal moment occurred around 2008–2009 at Fort Carson, where a fellow soldier was found with CSAM that included footage of Riley as a child. Riley says his commanding officer recognized him and approached him, but no action was taken—highlighting what he describes as systemic failure.
In February 2023, Riley began posting publicly on social media, sharing adoption records, military documents, and names. In September 2025, he met with Democratic aides on the House Oversight Committee and offered sworn testimony and a polygraph. He recorded over four hours of audio testimony with journalist Lisa Noelle Voldeng in November 2025, which was released publicly.
Despite these disclosures, no official investigation has been launched, and no charges have been filed. In early January 2026, after increased public attention and threats to his safety, Riley fled the U.S. for protection.
While Riley has provided verifiable documents (adoption papers, military records), independent corroboration from major news outlets, court filings, or law enforcement remains absent. Some experts, like Dr. Laura Robinson, have questioned the credibility of the claims, citing implausible details (e.g., Jane Goodall being involved in his care) and the lack of corroborating evidence.
The core of the controversy centers on whether Riley’s story—marked by extraordinary detail and public transparency—is a genuine survivor’s account or a conspiracy narrative lacking verifiable proof. The FBI contacted Riley in 2025 but has not publicly responded to his evidence.
“Sascha states that Trump was the ‘big boss’ who directed all of it. It was never Epstein. Sascha says he was assaulted at least three times by Trump.”
Sascha Riley’s Allegations Against Donald Trump
Sascha Riley alleges that Donald Trump was the “big boss” of the abuse network he was trafficked into as a child, not Jeffrey Epstein, and that he was assaulted by Trump at least three times during the early 1980s.
Key Claims
Trump as the “Big Boss”: Riley states Trump directed the trafficking and abuse operations, positioning himself above Epstein in both authority and sadism.
Sexual Assaults: Riley claims he was forced to perform sexual acts on Trump, including anal sex, during events in Enterprise, Alabama, known as “farm parties.”
Violent Retaliation: In one account, Riley says he used a tent stake with a condom to violently assault Trump anally in self-defense, causing injuries severe enough to require airlift to a hospital.
Presence During Murder: Riley alleges Trump was brought into a room after the murder of a child named Patricia, and then proceeded to sexually and physically assault him.
Corroboration and Response
These allegations are based entirely on Riley’s audio testimony, shared via Substack and social media in late 2025.
No official investigations, court filings, or law enforcement statements have confirmed the claims.
Major media outlets have not independently verified the allegations, and no named individuals, including Trump, have publicly responded.
Critics, including Dr. Laura Robinson, highlight timeline inconsistencies—Trump was actively involved in New York real estate during the alleged abuse period, with no documented absences.
“These are very serious allegations. When will they be acknowledged by the US authorities and the media and duly investigated?”
Current Status of Sascha Riley’s Allegations
As of January 19, 2026, no U.S. federal or state authority has officially acknowledged, launched an investigation into, or verified Sascha Riley’s allegations against Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, or other named figures.
Key Facts:
Riley’s claims are based on over four hours of audio testimony recorded in mid-2025 and released by journalist Lisa Noelle Voldeng via Substack.
He met with Democratic aides on the House Oversight Committee in September 2025 and offered to testify under oath and take a polygraph.
The FBI contacted Riley in 2025, but no public follow-up, investigation, or confirmation has been reported.
Mainstream media outlets (e.g., Times Now, Hindustan Times) have reported on the existence of the allegations but emphasize they remain unverified.
The Epstein files unsealed in late 2025 and early 2026 do not name William Sascha Riley as a victim or witness. Some speculate a “William ‘Bill’ Riley” mentioned as a private investigator may be connected, but this remains unconfirmed.
Barriers to Acknowledgment:
Lack of independent corroboration: No court filings, law enforcement reports, or forensic evidence (e.g., hospital records, flight logs) have been publicly verified.
Heavy redactions in Epstein files: Critics, including Rep. Ro Khanna, allege key documents are missing, limiting transparency.
Political sensitivity: Allegations involve high-profile figures, including President Donald Trump, which may influence institutional caution.
Public and Online Response:
Riley has a vocal online following on platforms like Threads and X, where supporters label him a credible survivor.
Fact-checking organizations (e.g., Factually.co) classify the claims as unverified, citing inconsistencies and lack of official documentation.
Skeptics point to implausible details, such as Jane Goodall’s alleged involvement, and unconfirmed military records.
Conclusion:
There is no timeline for official acknowledgment or investigation. Riley’s claims remain in the public and digital sphere, awaiting independent verification by law enforcement, the judiciary, or investigative journalism. Until then, authorities and major media treat the allegations as serious but unproven.
Donald Trump was not found guilty of sexual abuse in a criminal court, but a civil jury found him liable for sexual abuse in a 2023 trial.
On May 9, 2023, a federal jury in New York found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, based on a preponderance of evidence.
The jury concluded that Trump did not rape Carroll under New York’s narrow legal definition of rape (which requires penile penetration), but did commit a lesser degree of sexual abuse, including forcible touching and groping.
The verdict was not a criminal conviction, so Trump was not sentenced to prison. Instead, he was ordered to pay $5 million in damages.
The ruling was upheld by a federal appeals court in December 2024, confirming the civil liability.
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan later clarified that, while the jury did not find Trump liable for rape under New York law, the jury’s finding amounted to rape under the common understanding of the term.
This civil liability is a significant legal outcome, but it does not equate to a criminal conviction.
“So he’s an untrustworthy sexual deviant, and he could potentially molest your grandmother or your daughter or your wife if they were alone with him in a room?”
Yes, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court.
Return to Bomb Alley 1982 – The Falklands Deception
From Paul Cardin, a Falklands Conflict veteran. This is a biting commentary, told from the heart. Also included is a 1982 diary, written on location. This book forms a forensic inquiry into several conflict-related mysteries that have never been addressed or resolved - even after 40 years.
Wirral In It Together 