Can anyone argue with our reasoning here? WTF…?
And here’s their website…
▪️…disables respiratory viruses…making them harmless
In the UK, if we’re caught not wearing a face covering in shops or on public transport, we face a punitive volley of steeply rising fines until we’re forced to comply.
Yet matters are very much more relaxed for companies, with entrepreneurs who don’t allow facts to get in the way of their extravagant marketing claims. It’s no holds barred and there are no instant penalties to speak of. They seem to be free to exaggerate or make reckless claims in pursuit of their payday.
So they’re at liberty to capitalise on people’s fear during the crisis.
Whereas we are not even free to research the scientific studies, reach the obvious conclusion that face coverings and masks are ineffective against viruses, and make an informed choice.
How can this be permitted?